Teams

LO'Shea (Southampton)

2023 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-17vs MFigard (Matthews)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJanice Daniel / Denise Bost vs Elaine Myers / Rosa Szalanski5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesValerie Link / Nancy Christensen vs Dorothy Gandar / Karen Watford1-6, 0-6
2023-04-10vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Split 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Christensen / Valerie Link vs Linda Coelho / Sharon Surrett4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa O'Shea / Janice Daniel vs Julie Selz / Rene Griffin6-1, 6-1
2023-03-30vs APhillips/Horvath (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Christensen / Valerie Link vs Celia Stallings / Marilyn Chaney6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusie McCraney / Lisa O'Shea vs Faye Childress / Elizabeth Hollidge6-4, 6-2
2023-03-13vs EBailey (Sun City)Won 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Christensen / Valerie Link vs Johanna Johnson / Christine Norman6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa O'Shea / Denise Bost vs Linda Jester / Rosemary Souffrant6-1, 6-0
2023-03-06vs PKahle (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIrene Meares / Valerie Link vs Patty Kahle / Karen Trigg5-7, 1-6
2023-02-27vs CHobson (Weddington)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Janice Daniel vs Cyndie Hobson / Barbara Northrup7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValerie Link / Nancy Christensen vs Jane Neese / Kathi Todd6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Denise Bost
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Janice Daniel
published
3.30
W Kay Bridges
published
3.15
Cindy Wilson
published 3
3.06
Julia Payne
published
2.99
Lisa O'Shea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Valerie Link
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Nancy Christensen
published
2.85
Susie McCraney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Bost + Valerie Link10654% games−4.0% vs expected
Lisa O'Shea + Denise Bost271058% games−7.8% vs expected
Janice Daniel + Valerie Link213 matchesnot enough data
W Kay Bridges + Cindy Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Bost
205W–139L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Janice Daniel
17W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
W Kay Bridges
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Cindy Wilson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.15
Julia Payne
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Lisa O'Shea
83W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Valerie Link
83W–97L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Nancy Christensen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Susie McCraney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.