Teams

Driscoll - Dbls 3.0W

2022 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Summer Daze 3.0 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Summer Daze 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Lucy Callahan
published
3.20
Kelly Guyler
published
3.17
Claire Driscoll
published 3.5
3.09
Page Kreager
published
3.05
Meghan Hilleboe
published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.87
Rebecca Morrison
published
2.78
Gail Terrell
published 3
2.77
Lora Snyder
published
2.73
Aimee Largen
published 3
Kelly Pryzwansky
published
Melinda Billings
published
Susan Stull
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Terrell + Rebecca Morrison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Callahan
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelly Guyler
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Page Kreager
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Rebecca Morrison
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Lora Snyder
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Aimee Largen
15W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Stull
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.