Teams

Bullard - Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-04vs Anderson - PinehurstWon 20
W#2 DoublesDrake Neff / Averi Brown vs Sondra Montesi Yates / Shelly Manley6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLia Ernst / Tyler Chavonne vs Amy Metz / Debra Noschese6-0, 6-2
2025-07-22vs Hallock - Methodist UniversityWon 10
W#3 DoublesLia Ernst / Tyler Chavonne vs Jacqui Cannon / Wendy Vonnegut6-2, 6-0
2025-07-13vs Levine - Methodist UniversityLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Bullard / Lia Ernst vs Christina Griggs / Melissa Broadwater2-6, 4-6
2025-06-17vs Hallock - Methodist UniversityWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Bullard / Drake Neff vs Angela Daniel / Wendy Vonnegut6-3, 6-4
2025-06-10vs Anderson - PinehurstSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Bullard / Drake Neff vs Sondra Montesi Yates / Shelly Manley2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLia Ernst / Tyler Chavonne vs Amy Metz / Valerie Kline6-1, 6-4
2025-06-03vs Levine - Methodist UniversityWon 10
W#3 DoublesLia Ernst / Andrea Jacobs vs Melissa Broadwater / Susan Miller7-5, 6-3
2025-05-20vs Combs - Gates FourLost 01
L#2 DoublesLia Ernst / Drake Neff vs Jennifer Fincher / Corinna Williamson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Anna Owen
published 2.5
3.47
Jessica Kouba
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Katherine Armstrong
published
3.36
Andrea Jacobs
published 3
3.09
Averi Brown
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3
2.83
Drake Neff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Tyler Chavonne
published
2.75
Lia Ernst
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.64
Katie Bullard
published
1.94
Courtney McDaniel
published 2.5
Michelle Pecko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Chavonne + Katie Bullard7357% games+7.6% vs expected
Drake Neff + Lia Ernst3452% gamesnot enough data
Averi Brown + Lia Ernst314 matchesnot enough data
Drake Neff + Averi Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Anna Owen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.47
3.5
Jessica Kouba
56W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Katherine Armstrong
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3
Andrea Jacobs
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3
Averi Brown
58W–25L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Drake Neff
38W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Tyler Chavonne
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Anne Catherine Williams
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Lia Ernst
35W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Katie Bullard
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
2.5
Courtney McDaniel
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Michelle Pecko
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.