Teams

SOL:Net Assets II:Sansone

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Men Summer · 3.5 Men

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-12vs MRC:Hit Men:SprattoWon 21
W#1 DoublesDean Hoffman / Igor Shuli vs Joseph Trudeau / Michael Nolan7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesFrederick Kincheloe / Justo Reyes vs Lambro Dupi / Camden Michaud6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Tom Birkett vs Eric Nottonson / James Monroe6-7, 4-6
2026-07-11vs TCT: 3.5: Alexander/PaganoWon 30
W#1 DoublesDean Hoffman / Glen Sansone vs Alex Copp / Jack McCarthy7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIgor Shuli vs Saul Zion6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFrederick Kincheloe / Robert van Glahn vs Stuart Swan / Ken Greene6-3, 6-4
2026-06-28vs TRC:Field Of Dreams:FieldsWon 21
W#1 DoublesIgor Shuli / Jiang Qian vs Joseph Rumore / Max Goldring6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDoron Markowitz / David Kimmel vs Max Kali / Eugene Chin6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMitchell Kim / Robert van Glahn vs JUAN OVIEDO / Juan Oviedo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-14vs MIT:Bulldogs:ZazzeraWon 31
W#1 DoublesIgor Shuli / James Elliot vs Ryan Moran / Laurent Zazzera6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGreg Berthomieu vs Pat Brydon6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIsaac Ro / Dean Hoffman vs Matthew Spoerndle / Keegan Etter7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Davy Langlais vs Kurt Kaufman / Oscar Perez5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDean Hoffman / Frederick Kincheloe vs David Friedman / Fernando Zapotoczny3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKevin Han vs EIKI MERA6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Kimmel / Glen Sansone vs Paolo Fontana / James Kim6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDavy Langlais / Mitchell Kim vs David Miles Friedman / Eric Schwartz3-6, 2-6
2026-05-31vs MRC:Hit Men:SprattoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDean Hoffman / Glen Sansone vs James Monroe / Joseph Trudeau6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKevin Han vs Ed Soto1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJusto Reyes / Frederick Kincheloe vs Christopher Spratto / Brett Carroll2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIsaac Ro / Mitchell Kim vs Rushabh Padalia / Lambro Dupi7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-24vs TCT: 3.5: Alexander/PaganoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJiang Qian / Mitchell Kim vs Alex Copp / Garfield Isaacs6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDean Hoffman / David Kimmel vs John McCarthy / Stuart Swan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDoron Markowitz / Tom Birkett vs Valmiki Prasad / Ken Greene6-1, 6-1
2026-05-17vs TRC:Field Of Dreams:FieldsWon 40
W#1 DoublesGlen Sansone / Frederick Kincheloe vs Edilberto Maestre / Rodrigo Maestre6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJiang Qian vs Marko Micic6-3, 4-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Han / Isaac Ro vs Tomo Asanovic / Max Kali6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert van Glahn / Davy Langlais vs JUAN OVIEDO / JUAN OVIEDO7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs MIT:Bulldogs:ZazzeraWon 40
W#1 DoublesJusto Reyes / Dean Hoffman vs Kendall Spaght / Laurent Zazzera2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJiang Qian vs Jack Parkes6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJames Elliot / Igor Shuli vs Keegan Etter / Lue Villa3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert van Glahn / Davy Langlais vs Matthew Davis / Oscar Perez6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesGlen Sansone / Igor Shuli vs Fernando Zapotoczny / Anthony DiPippa6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJames Elliot vs EIKI MERA6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Han / Isaac Ro vs Max Borchert / Nathan Kerxhalli6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDoron Markowitz / Frederick Kincheloe vs James Pratt-Heaney / David Friedman6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SOL: Tenacity: Schaumburg/Sattler08211125249
2WRC: Weston Wolverines: Zapotoczny/Fontana08211128239
3KH: Cassidy/Nelson09201635305
4NC:Not My Faults:Woo/Mahajan09191741303
5TRC:Field Of Dreams:Fields09171946348
6INT:You're Only Served Once:Weber0943264413
7CP: Ball Busters:Tierney/Flood01032824252
8SOL:Net Assets II:Sansone010301028292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jiang Qian
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Justo Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
James Elliot
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Igor Shuli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.48
Dean Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Doron Markowitz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kevin Han
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.31
Glen Sansone
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Greg Berthomieu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Benjamin McGill
published 3.5
3.23
David Kimmel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Robert van Glahn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
R Peter Sanchez
published
3.15
Mitchell Kim
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Davy Langlais
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Isaac Ro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Frederick Kincheloe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Tom Birkett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Garry Feldman
published 3.5
Joseph Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Hoffman + Jiang Qian8167% games+17.7% vs expected
Dean Hoffman + Igor Shuli6165% games+11.7% vs expected
Joseph Garcia + Garry Feldman3545% games+8.3% vs expected
Doron Markowitz + Dean Hoffman7063% games+6.8% vs expected
Glen Sansone + Dean Hoffman19560% games+4.3% vs expected
Igor Shuli + James Elliot22360% games+4.2% vs expected
Mitchell Kim + Frederick Kincheloe1544% games−3.2% vs expected
Robert van Glahn + Tom Birkett6745% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jiang Qian
37W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.71
Justo Reyes
53W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
James Elliot
165W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Igor Shuli
71W–24L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Dean Hoffman
74W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Doron Markowitz
71W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Kevin Han
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Glen Sansone
122W–99L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Greg Berthomieu
44W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Benjamin McGill
62W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
David Kimmel
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Robert van Glahn
24W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
R Peter Sanchez
33W–46L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Mitchell Kim
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Davy Langlais
3W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Isaac Ro
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Frederick Kincheloe
94W–72L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Tom Birkett
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Garry Feldman
46W–48L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
Joseph Garcia
18W–50L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.