Teams

SPANISH BAY CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesAnila Light / Sylvia Lee vs Kathryn Tiffany / Xiaoyun Han0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Scherer / Ann Artz vs Kristie Solomon / Kotim Pak4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRegina Morrison / Tamami Pisano vs Tomomi Albert / Melanie Cazenas6-4, 6-1
2025-10-04vs GILROY TENNIS CTR CW6.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Brandt / Erin High vs Corrine Fabie / Melanie Cazenas6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Jensen / Kirstie Wilde vs Elaine Kwok / Denise Galocy6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Mccullough / Maureen Webb vs Deborah Hao / Xiaoyun Han5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-08-30vs WALLENBERG PK CW6.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesSylvia Lee / Katie Klevan vs Theresse Tan / Kalina Stephani7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAmy Brandt / Maureen Webb vs Elaine Kwok / Anna-liza Estoesta3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTamami Pisano / Natalie Lott vs Jewel A Knofler / Carla Ruigh1-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Maria Eldridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Erin High
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Kirstie Wilde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Kim Tope
published
3.36
Nancy P Taylor
published
3.28
Sylvia Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Regina Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Katie Klevan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Tamami Pisano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Amy Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.10
Erin Madeira
published 3.5
3.07
Maureen Webb
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Jennifer Stachel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Ann Artz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Julie Mccullough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Anila Light
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Dani Dayton
published 3
Mary Scherer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Lott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy P Taylor + Erin High4148% games−6.9% vs expected
Amy Brandt + Erin High4172% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Stachel + Katie Klevan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Eldridge
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Erin High
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Kirstie Wilde
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kim Tope
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
Nancy P Taylor
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Sylvia Lee
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Regina Morrison
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Katie Klevan
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
Tamami Pisano
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.19
3
Amy Brandt
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
3.5
Erin Madeira
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Maureen Webb
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Stachel
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Ann Artz
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Julie Mccullough
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Anila Light
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Dani Dayton
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
Mary Scherer
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Lott
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.