Teams

BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolan

2025 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-23vs BC-LLW-MCC/KathleenStephensLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaelee Friedrich / Carly Spadier vs Katie Ball / Jackie Kuehlewind4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusanne Hecker / Karen Nolan vs Juli Kanner / Stephanie Deur1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Thompson / Stephanie Hanger vs Shefali Rao / Janna Hahn2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-28vs BC-LLW-MCC/KathleenStephensLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Nolan / Heidi Thompson vs Corey Henkle / Janna Hahn1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Gonzalez / Nicky Quinn vs Alex Sheehan / Ashley Goldsmith3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStephanie Hanger / Danelle Griebenow vs Lillian Bohannon / Erika Wadler2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Jill Whan
published
3.10
Kristina O'Brien
published
3.00
Kira Lynch
published
2.88
Alex Brasch
published 3
2.80
Heidi Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danelle Griebenow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Grace Coopman
published 3
2.75
Stephanie Hanger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Erin Levin
published 3
2.63
Karen Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Ellen Klein
published 3
Carly Spadier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kaelee Friedrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicky Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susanne Hecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Whan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
3.52
Kristina O'Brien
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.10
Kira Lynch
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Alex Brasch
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Heidi Gonzalez
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Danelle Griebenow
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Grace Coopman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Hanger
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Erin Levin
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Karen Nolan
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Ellen Klein
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Carly Spadier
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kaelee Friedrich
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicky Quinn
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susanne Hecker
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.