Teams

Dallas/JB/AP

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 2.5 Novice - Women · 2.5 Novice - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-27vs Trimarchi/JB/APLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Smith / Lynette Chastain vs Caitlin Sullins / Kelli Adkins0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLindsay Massey vs Veronica Trimarchi6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Myers / Samantha Spillman vs April Grove / Hannah Malone0-6, 5-7
2025-05-19vs Chambers/JB/APCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarieta Posey / Lindsay Massey vs June Long / Meredith Clark6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSamantha Spillman / Lynette Chastain vs Hannah Chambers / Linda Smith0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Novice - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Cherry Dallas
published 3.5
2.55
Kylie DeVries
published
2.16
Lindsay Massey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.98
Samantha Spillman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.68
Lynette Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marieta Posey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherry Dallas
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Kylie DeVries
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
Lindsay Massey
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Samantha Spillman
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Lynette Chastain
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.68
Marieta Posey
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.