Teams

PNussman/MJegier (Providence Plantation)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-15vs BMarks (Providence CC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Margaux Karagosian vs Elizabeth Rudder / Natasha Brasch6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Jenkins / Marie Schulz vs Kate Schumacher / Anna Troppmann2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Hoots / Karen Fisher vs Maggie Webb / Helen Daly6-2, 6-2
2023-05-01vs SStorck (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Margaux Karagosian vs Lisa Dunning / Kyna Savedge6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurie Hoots / Marie Schulz vs Martha Metzl / Patricia Phelan3-6, 5-7
2023-04-24vs EBrandon (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesColette Wilkes / Margaux Karagosian vs Sally Davidson / Lori van Blarcom1-6, 3-6
2023-04-17vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMargaux Karagosian / Karen Fisher vs Heidi Friedman / Wendi Brown6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Kerr / Laurie Hoots vs Amy Yancey / Susan Taylor6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Melinda Mitchell vs Tamara Wise / Jennifer Harrison6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs KCox (MPCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Jenkins / Margaux Karagosian vs Katie Cox / Haley Timperio6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMarie Schulz vs Rebecca Drendel4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Laurie Hoots vs Torey Parsons / Melissa Sullivan6-1, 6-0
2023-04-03vs MAyers/JZuehlke (Park Crossing)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMargaux Karagosian / Karen Fisher vs Memory Ayers / Diane Harrington6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarie Schulz / Melinda Mitchell vs Mary Lynn Thigpen / Sarah Jacques6-2, 6-3
2023-03-23vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Laurie Hoots vs Emily Pease / Tiffany Kopittke3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMargaux Karagosian vs Dana Holloman7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Fisher / Colette Wilkes vs Kristy Simmons / Karen Schneider6-0, 6-2
2023-03-13vs LO'Callaghan/Herlong (Firethorne)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Fisher / Marie Schulz vs Debbie Malseed / Lorna O'Callaghan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hoots / Phyllis Nussman vs Lauren Epperly / Michelle DeVaney6-2, 6-3
2023-03-06vs KBorans/JZarambo (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Fisher / Laurie Hoots vs Kimberly Borans / Melissa House2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Marie Schulz vs Victoria Sofarelli / Jamie Zarambo7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-27vs DFerguson (Life Time)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMargaux Karagosian / Karen Fisher vs Tracy Komito / Susan Knowlton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPhyllis Nussman / Michelle Jegier vs Kimberly Warpula / Wendi Peters6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarie Schulz / Lindsey Kerr vs Alexis Galbreath / Melissa Eccleston7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Margaux Karagosian
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #1 Singles 8% · published 4
3.48
Lindsey Kerr
published
3.30
Laurie Hoots
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Marie Schulz
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Michelle Jegier
published
3.10
Tracy Jenkins
published
3.10
Colette Wilkes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Phyllis Nussman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.03
Karen Fisher
published
3.00
Stacy Andrews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colette Wilkes + Phyllis Nussman0527% games−12.1% vs expected
Marie Schulz + Laurie Hoots2846% gamesnot enough data
Marie Schulz + Phyllis Nussman2541% gamesnot enough data
Colette Wilkes + Laurie Hoots4350% gamesnot enough data
Marie Schulz + Colette Wilkes2444% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Hoots + Phyllis Nussman3255% gamesnot enough data
Margaux Karagosian + Laurie Hoots134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Fisher + Colette Wilkes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Margaux Karagosian
88W–52L career · 12 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Lindsey Kerr
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Laurie Hoots
65W–46L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Marie Schulz
29W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Michelle Jegier
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Tracy Jenkins
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Colette Wilkes
19W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Phyllis Nussman
32W–56L career · 8 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Karen Fisher
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Stacy Andrews
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.