Teams

Pinyan 18s 2.5W Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women 18 & Over Thurs PM

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesPaola Scilinguo-Mendoza / Allison Chisholm vs Lindsey Rowe / Margaret Reyes6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPhyllis Lancaster / Tessa Olinger vs Christy Weir / Emma Maggi6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesColleen Pinyan / Julia Jones vs Ashley Boteler / Kasey Dampier6-1, 6-0
2026-08-13vs GVP 18s 2.5 Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth McQuaid / Phyllis Lancaster vs Tammy Milani / Lisa Sullivan6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLorena Hall / Susan Barnes vs Renee Hicks / Holden Ehlinger6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAllison Sharpe / Tessa Olinger vs Jenna Ahmad / Lindsey Ricker2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & Over Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Phyllis Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Allison Chisholm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.55
Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Julia Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Tessa Olinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Beth McQuaid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Colleen Pinyan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Katherine Shields
published
2.31
Carrie Valencia
published 2.5
2.30
Lorena Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.01
Sophia de Vries
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.00
Annette Bagnoli
published 2.5
1.93
Allison Sharpe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth McQuaid + Colleen Pinyan1438% games−10.8% vs expected
Julia Jones + Lorena Hall224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Shields + Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza123 matchesnot enough data
Lorena Hall + Sophia de Vries123 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Pinyan + Allison Chisholm033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phyllis Lancaster
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.40
2.5
Allison Chisholm
27W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Paola Scilinguo-Mendoza
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%37%63%
2.55
Julia Jones
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Tessa Olinger
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Beth McQuaid
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Colleen Pinyan
8W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Katherine Shields
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Carrie Valencia
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Lorena Hall
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Sophia de Vries
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Annette Bagnoli
3W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Allison Sharpe
5W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.