Teams

Whichard 7.0 Mixed 40+ Tues

2023 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40+ Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Scott Sharer vs Kim Wallace / Philip Craft7-6, 6-2
2023-07-18vs GORHAM 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesWon 20
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Eric McFarlin vs Pamela Aikens / John Mickler6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Jones / Karyn Efird vs Janet Gorham / Steve A'Della6-0, 6-2
2023-07-11vs Davis 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Eric McFarlin vs Steve Hestenes / Linda Hestenes6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-27vs Herron/Berreth 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 02
L#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Eric McFarlin vs Marsha Tice / Keith Pearson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Whichard / Karyn Efird vs Jeff Shealy / Kathryn Michaud3-6, 4-6
2023-06-06vs Flanagan 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Eric McFarlin vs Julie Dover / Kevin Dover3-6, 6-7
2023-05-30vs Kirby 7.0 Mixed 40+ TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Jones / Karyn Efird vs Jennifer Tewksbury / Bill Vary1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40+ Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Virginia Easley
published
3.58
Karyn Efird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Ron Mangrum
published
3.33
Coray Mitchell
published 3.5
3.33
Vangie Cruz
published
3.10
Janice Gilman
published
3.00
Doug Heberle
published 3
2.96
Chris Whichard
published 3
2.95
Lara Heberle
published
2.91
Eric McFarlin
published 3
2.55
Carl Crowder
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Heberle + Doug Heberle5947% games−8.3% vs expected
Eric McFarlin + Vangie Cruz134 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Efird + Chris Whichard134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Virginia Easley
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
Ron Mangrum
14W–35L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Coray Mitchell
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
Vangie Cruz
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Janice Gilman
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Doug Heberle
35W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Chris Whichard
26W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
Lara Heberle
28W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Eric McFarlin
30W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Carl Crowder
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.