Teams

Huguenot - Lombardo

2023 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-03vs Deerwood - KirovWon 10
W#3 DoublesErika Hermetz / Jim Young vs Lisa Aboudan / Georgi Kirov6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-16vs Deerwood - KirovWon 10
W#2 DoublesErika Hermetz / Stan Young vs Christopher Sawdon / Jill Evans6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-24vs Sawgrass - WerbaLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Hermetz / Stan Young vs Michael Peters / Joan Grune6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-27vs Huguenot - HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Shortall / Lillian Cutaj vs Cara Binaco / Michael Greek5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-01-20vs Baymeadows - TorresLost 01
L#2 DoublesErika Hermetz / Jim Young vs Sampat Choudhary / Karu Choudhary4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
David Lee
published 4
Erika Hermetz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Lillian Cutaj
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Paula Burdash
published
3.28
Brian Shortall
published 3.5
3.28
Dominick Bucca
published 3.5
Carol Inman
published 3.5
3.24
Elizabeth Messina
published 3.5
3.22
Tammy Oswald
published
2.82
Anna Harper
published 3
2.76
Debbie Bucca
published 3
2.65
Patricia Lombardo
published
Jim Young
published
M Delahunty
published
Mark Dew
published
Stan Young
published
Vito Lombardo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominick Bucca + Debbie Bucca213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Messina + M Delahunty213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Lee
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Erika Hermetz
35W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Lillian Cutaj
88W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Paula Burdash
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Brian Shortall
4W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Dominick Bucca
5W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Carol Inman
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Messina
10W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Anna Harper
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Debbie Bucca
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
Patricia Lombardo
13W–24L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jim Young
24W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
M Delahunty
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Dew
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stan Young
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vito Lombardo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.