Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-16vs HMTC PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Henry Fang vs Roger Butts / Arte Libunao2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJeff Arnett vs Crip Erickson7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames DuPriest / Chris Provost vs Steve Weber / Nick Hansen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Robert Rubin vs Michael King / Fabio Sandri2-6, 4-6
2024-07-09vs FCCC WHITELost 13
L#1 DoublesNicholas Diel / Daniel Holmes vs James Dickinson / Greg Lammons3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJeff Arnett vs David Shigekane4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames DuPriest / Scott Houldsworth vs Dean Barber / Don Kennedy6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Mike Keefe vs Neal McConnellogue / Rick Lowder2-6, 4-6
2024-07-02vs LVTA NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames DuPriest / Daniel Holmes vs Kurt Rinne / Jason Boxerman6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeff Arnett vs Dave Trammell6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHenry Fang / Chris Provost vs Paul Akers / Steve Thomas3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-25vs MLF BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Nicholas Diel vs Derek Chun / Markus Ritsch6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJeff Arnett vs Jasjot Johar6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWade Bontempo / Scott Houldsworth vs Kendell Buxton / Robert Sullivan6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRodney Campos / Aaron Carta vs Edward Kendall / Thomas Kampe7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-18vs MLF YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWade Bontempo / Chris Provost vs James Dyer / Tim Walsh6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesScott Kunze / Robert Rubin vs Luko Krnan / Stephen Fredman4-6, 2-6
2024-06-11vs FCCC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Nicholas Diel vs Austin Kelly / Chad Preiss6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHenry Fang vs Kevin Brookfield6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJames DuPriest / Scott Houldsworth vs Joseph Basta / Brian Dunbar6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRodney Campos / Diego Melchert vs Jon Clay / James Clay4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jeff Arnett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.43
Daniel Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Nicholas Diel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Rodney Campos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Chris Provost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Diego Melchert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Henry Fang
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
James DuPriest
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Hiller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Scott Houldsworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Aaron Carta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Mike Keefe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Scott Kunze
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Wade Bontempo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Holmes + Chris Provost6161% games+5.3% vs expected
Scott Houldsworth + James DuPriest5357% games+4.4% vs expected
Mike Keefe + Andrew Hiller1440% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Holmes + Nicholas Diel3256% gamesnot enough data
Rodney Campos + Mike Keefe213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Holmes + Scott Houldsworth303 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Holmes + Jeff Arnett303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Houldsworth + Nicholas Diel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Arnett
48W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Daniel Holmes
57W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Nicholas Diel
73W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Rodney Campos
58W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Chris Provost
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Diego Melchert
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Henry Fang
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
James DuPriest
30W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Hiller
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Scott Houldsworth
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.21
3.5
Aaron Carta
49W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Mike Keefe
36W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Scott Kunze
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Wade Bontempo
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.