Teams

GEPTA/18&overMX/9.0/Maese/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 4.36 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesTravis Fortune / Rachel Tebow vs Stephanie Zaragoza / Gabriel Alvarez6-3, 6-2
2025-07-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Tebow / Travis Fortune vs Monica Schmidt / Michael Schmidt2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTravis Fortune / Rachel Tebow vs Rohan Maiti / Olivia Guzman6-1, 6-3
2025-07-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesTravis Fortune / Rachel Tebow vs Abraham Gandarilla / Daniela Chretin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesDante Garcia / Vanessa Valdez vs Eric Jurecky / Monica Schmidt6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesTravis Fortune / Rachel Tebow vs JACOBO CARDIEL / MarieJosee Lefebvre7-5, 6-4
2025-06-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesTravis Fortune / Rachel Tebow vs Susana Elias / Rene Archuleta6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVanessa Valdez / Dante Garcia vs Abraham Gandarilla / Christianne Alvarez6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVanessa Valdez / Dante Garcia vs Jeffrey Pfeifer / Jennifer Larsen6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connor Witty
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 5
4.28
Alex Anoveros
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.27
Daniela Ito
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.09
Carlos Fraire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.78
Delaney Kuehnel
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.73
Dante Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.64
Beatrice Maese
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 4
Erika Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Hannah Juarez
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
ISAAC GABRIEL ROYVAL-LARA
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jacob Maese
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Uraga
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Liliana Cano
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Rachel Tebow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sebastian Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Travis Fortune
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Ulrich Delafuente
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Vanessa Valdez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delaney Kuehnel + Hannah Juarez10170% gamesnot enough data
Beatrice Maese + Hannah Juarez2539% gamesnot enough data
Juan Uraga + Daniela Ito5165% gamesnot enough data
Travis Fortune + Rachel Tebow6058% gamesnot enough data
Beatrice Maese + Liliana Cano224 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Juarez + Connor Witty314 matchesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Carlos Fraire123 matchesnot enough data
Dante Garcia + Vanessa Valdez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Witty
6W–5L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Alex Anoveros
42W–43L career · 13 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Daniela Ito
46W–24L career · 21 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Carlos Fraire
39W–58L career · 8 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Delaney Kuehnel
33W–14L career · 14 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dante Garcia
103W–34L career · 13 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Beatrice Maese
74W–86L career · 17 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Erika Herrera
22W–12L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hannah Juarez
79W–45L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
ISAAC GABRIEL ROYVAL-LARA
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Maese
48W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Uraga
89W–29L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liliana Cano
55W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Tebow
13W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sebastian Acosta
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Fortune
17W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ulrich Delafuente
61W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Valdez
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.