Teams

CVTA BLUE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-03vs BTA-C REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Fitzgerald / Eric Maier vs Joshua Harrison / Matt Richtel6-2, 6-0
2026-08-20vs TTA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Eric Maier vs Eric Jaggers / Anthony Garcia6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRocky Nelson vs Ian Harris5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesConnor Ohlsen / Paul Kolachov vs Marcel de Graaf / Philip Dixon-Patterson6-3, 6-4
2026-08-14vs RCC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Rocky Nelson vs Andrew Hefter / Ryne Walz6-3, 6-2
2026-08-06vs BTA-C REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Connor Ohlsen vs Azur Ali / Joshua Harrison6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRocky Nelson vs Blake Howard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Miller / Paul Kolachov vs Nadeem Ishaq / Duncan Burke6-2, 6-4
2026-07-31vs RCC GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesRocky Nelson vs Andrew Hefter6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Kolachov / Connor Ohlsen vs John Hamill / Bobby Virasingh6-3, 6-3
2026-07-31vs TTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesRocky Nelson / Andrew Schifle vs Marcel de Graaf / Eric Jaggers6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Maier / Peter Fitzgerald vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Connor Ohlsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.47
Eric Maier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.46
Peter Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Andrew Schifle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Paul Kolachov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Rocky Nelson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Maier + Peter Fitzgerald12072% games+12.2% vs expected
Paul Kolachov + Eric Maier7067% games+8.9% vs expected
Craig Hoeltgen + Andrew Schifle5164% games+6.2% vs expected
Connor Ohlsen + Craig Hoeltgen11360% games+5.3% vs expected
Craig Hoeltgen + Eric Maier6165% games+2.4% vs expected
Connor Ohlsen + Paul Kolachov404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Eric Maier
69W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
4.47
Peter Fitzgerald
35W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
67W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
Andrew Schifle
39W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Paul Kolachov
44W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
Rocky Nelson
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.