Teams

TRogovin (JCC)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-03vs JWoodruff (CSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Tsadaka / Tina Rogovin vs Amy Brittain / Kathy Spence4-6, 5-7
2025-09-12vs CAckels (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Loor / Debra van Glish vs Amy Eades / Carla Ackels2-6, 3-6
2025-09-05vs CMcKiernan (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Tsadaka / Tina Rogovin vs Jennifer Stacks / Katie Eggers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-29vs KBaldwin (Charlotte CC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMeryl Hunte / Kate Loor vs Lanny Gillespie / Brooks Haislip0-6, 4-6
2025-08-28vs JHerlong/Ocallaghan (FCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMeryl Hunte / Tina Rogovin vs Johanne Bulger / Janine Geada4-6, 6-7
2025-08-21vs ATrexler/KNelson (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeryl Hunte / Tina Rogovin vs Tonya Miller / Caroline Stamatovich1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-15vs VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Tsadaka / Tina Rogovin vs Pattye Figman / Suzanne Jones6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Caryn Craige
published 3.5
2.94
Kate Loor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Lauren Fine
published
2.89
Carrie Feit
published 3
2.84
Debra van Glish
published 3
Amy Altieri
published 3
2.72
Tina Rogovin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Meryl Hunte
published
2.58
Lisa Cosolito
published
Maria Palios
published
Maria Tsadaka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Rogovin + Debra van Glish4158% gamesnot enough data
Debra van Glish + Lisa Cosolito213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caryn Craige
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Kate Loor
49W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Lauren Fine
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Carrie Feit
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Debra van Glish
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Amy Altieri
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Tina Rogovin
75W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Meryl Hunte
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.70
Lisa Cosolito
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%28%72%
2.58
Maria Palios
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Tsadaka
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.