Teams

MEtzel (BCC)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-26vs CTerry (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Jami Stone vs Rhonda Tate / Renata Riechelmann6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2022-09-19vs TRand (Firethorne)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Jami Stone vs TARA RAND / Shari Goldstein2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-12vs CFuller (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Jami Stone vs Ashley Hewitt / Maureen Hussey7-6, 6-2
2022-08-29vs LBurks-Adams/JGentile (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Jami Stone vs Linda Burks-Adams / Leidys Pinzon6-4, 6-1
2022-08-15vs SPurdy (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Sappenfield / Jami Stone vs Carrie Carickhoff / Melissa Kreager2-6, 3-6
2022-08-08vs CTerry (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Kelley / Jami Stone vs Deidre Miesse / Heather Taylor6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kathleen Stepp
published
3.22
Terri Kletch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Jami Stone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Tracy Reitz
published
2.88
Gaye Holmes
published 3
2.59
Kristin Webster
published
2.58
2.54
Margit Etzel
published
2.52
Nathalie Malter
published
2.41
Ellen McKane
published 2.5
Kim Rosenburgh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Sappenfield + Tracy Reitz4146% games−12.7% vs expected
Tracy Reitz + Kristin Webster0538% gamesnot enough data
Nathalie Malter + Margit Etzel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Stepp
25W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Terri Kletch
60W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Jami Stone
97W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Tracy Reitz
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Gaye Holmes
8W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Kristin Webster
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Andrea Sappenfield
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Margit Etzel
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
Nathalie Malter
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Ellen McKane
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%76%24%
2.41
Kim Rosenburgh
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.