Teams

Druid Hills (Mary McConnell)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 3.5 Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-17vs Glenlake (Paula Carman)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesDiane Leonard / Molly Malone vs Tracy Heaberlin / Teresa Horan6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKelley Todd vs Julia Dragoo6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnastasia Diavolitsis / Claudia Faulkenberry vs Carolyn Allen / Melanie Speed7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNiccole Burton / Mary Mcconnell vs Pam Stidham-Bullock / Annsley Klehr6-4, 6-2
W#4 DoublesAlison Ballard / Laura Ward Knebusch vs Rita Kelley / Lynne PEEK-CUNY6-2, 6-3
2025-12-13vs Rockdale TC (Dana Harvey)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesDiane Leonard / Casey Moriarty vs Susan Norton / Sonnia Stoveall3-6, 6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDanielle Gorand Carpenter vs Adriane Ivey2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Faulkenberry / Anastasia Diavolitsis vs Beth Smith / Dana Harvey2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNiccole Burton / Tema Mueller vs Nayasha Mendez / Vivia Dodson1-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesMary Mcconnell / Kara Pollard vs Adrienne Wise / Sarah Head6-0, 6-2
2025-12-06vs Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)*Lost 14
W#1 DoublesCasey Moriarty / Diane Leonard vs D'ablo Hunter / Rose Prejean-Harris6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKara Pollard vs Tiara McClain4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnastasia Diavolitsis / Niccole Burton vs Marsha Johnson / Julie Williams3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Mcconnell / Molly Malone vs Jeannie Doole / Tamara LeClair6-3, 2-6, 7-6
L#4 DoublesAnne Elzemeyer / Alison Ballard vs Karen Webb-Smith / Carolyn Wilson0-6, 4-6
2025-11-22vs Sugar Creek (Dianna Kelly)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesKayla Williams / Anne Elzemeyer vs Cheryl Coleman / Angela Selmon6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLindsay Marshburn vs Danielle Edwards3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKara Pollard / Danielle Gorand Carpenter vs Keri Sims / Peggy Hosey6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTema Mueller / Niccole Burton vs Wanda Haywood / Audrey LaBranch3-6, 7-5, 5-7
W#4 DoublesMary Mcconnell / Hayley Edwards vs Wendy Rachel / Joyce Frederick6-1, 6-3
2025-11-15vs Druid Hills (Dana Pederson)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesDiane Leonard / Casey Moriarty vs Kate Ippen / Elizabeth Ledet2-6, 6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsay Marshburn vs Shellie Sewell7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMolly Malone / Hayley Edwards vs Jessica Braunstein / Renee Klein6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaudia Faulkenberry / Anastasia Diavolitsis vs Monika Loving / Laura Madrid6-7, 6-4, 6-0
W#4 DoublesKara Pollard / Danielle Gorand Carpenter vs Meg Taylor / Jane Kelly6-3, 6-0
2025-11-08vs Glenlake TC (Emily Howell)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesClaudia Faulkenberry / Anastasia Diavolitsis vs Natalie Turner / Emily Howell3-6, 6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelley Todd vs Ariella Faitelson7-6, 3-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHayley Edwards / Katie O'Brien vs Joanne Sanford / Rita Huerta Papangelou7-6, 2-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Mcconnell / Laura Ward Knebusch vs Nancy Wallace / Hanna Kaplan6-1, 6-3
W#4 DoublesLindsay Marshburn / Danielle Gorand Carpenter vs April Belanger / Kolby Sanders-Lewis6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Diane Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Molly Malone
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Casey Moriarty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Claudia Faulkenberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Kayla Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Hayley Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Kara Pollard
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Anastasia Diavolitsis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Kelley Todd
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Chi Keitchen
published 3.5
3.21
Niccole Burton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Danielle Gorand Carpenter
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Mary Mcconnell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Jodi Feldman
published
3.13
Laura Ward Knebusch
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Lindsay Marshburn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Tema Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Anne Elzemeyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.75
Alison Ballard
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katie O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Cochran
published
Margaret Saft
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Leonard + Casey Moriarty11557% games+1.9% vs expected
Anne Elzemeyer + Mary Mcconnell2443% gamesnot enough data
Anastasia Diavolitsis + Claudia Faulkenberry4158% gamesnot enough data
Diane Leonard + Niccole Burton224 matchesnot enough data
Katie O'Brien + Hayley Edwards224 matchesnot enough data
Niccole Burton + Tema Mueller134 matchesnot enough data
Anne Elzemeyer + Danielle Gorand Carpenter134 matchesnot enough data
Chi Keitchen + Anastasia Diavolitsis314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Leonard
45W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Molly Malone
18W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
3.5
Casey Moriarty
37W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Claudia Faulkenberry
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kayla Williams
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Hayley Edwards
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Kara Pollard
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Anastasia Diavolitsis
15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Kelley Todd
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Chi Keitchen
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Niccole Burton
45W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Danielle Gorand Carpenter
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Mary Mcconnell
39W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jodi Feldman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Laura Ward Knebusch
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lindsay Marshburn
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Tema Mueller
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Anne Elzemeyer
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Alison Ballard
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Katie O'Brien
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Cochran
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Saft
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.