Teams

RCCB - Woods

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 5.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-09vs Fee - NormanLost 12
L#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Cheryl Madlener vs Milena Alicea / Kelly Norman6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLindsay Nichols / Mona Peterson vs Laura Rouveyrol / Alicia Sucre4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTricia Patterson / Debbie Jensen vs Marsha Napier / Jacinta Iezzi6-3, 6-2
2026-07-02vs Cape Canaveral - HughesWon 21
L#1 DoublesLindsay Nichols / Debbie Jensen vs Rene Hurst-Wall / Frances Miles3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Denise Canina vs Kelli Cordis / Lesa Haas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMayra Campbell / Lael Woods vs Marianne Pluchino / Jennifer Bailey6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-18vs Fee - NormanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Mayra Campbell vs Barbra Fortes / Alicia Sucre5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Denise Canina vs Jacinta Iezzi / Karina Ortiz6-0, 6-0
2026-06-11vs Cape Canaveral - HughesWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Paul / Tricia Patterson vs Frances Miles / Rene Hurst-Wall7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLindsay Nichols / Debbie Jensen vs Lesa Haas / MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRachel Gould / Cheryl Madlener vs Garrett Kuge / Cheryl Toth6-2, 6-4
2026-05-28vs Fee - NormanLost 12
W#1 DoublesRuthan Tattersall / Wendy Paul vs Kelly Norman / Barbra Fortes6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTricia Patterson / Denise Canina vs Hanh Pham / Michelle Dunn5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCyndi Mcdougall / Mona Peterson vs Marsha Napier / Milena Alicea6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs Cape Canaveral - HughesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsay Nichols / Wendy Paul vs Kerry Sawyer / Catalina Calvert6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Mona Peterson vs Mary Samples / Kelli Cordis6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCyndi Mcdougall / Debbie Jensen vs Rene Hurst-Wall / Frances Miles3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.89
Lindsay Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Tricia Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Rachel Gould
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Ruthan Tattersall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Cyndi Mcdougall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
2.52
Denise Canina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Mona Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Lael Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Wendy Paul
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Mccaughin
published 2.5
Cheryl Madlener
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.21
Debbie Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.20
Joanne Ludwig
published
Mayra Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Patterson + Lindsay Nichols5254% games+0.7% vs expected
Tricia Patterson + Shelley Vandermeulen3259% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Nichols + Denise Canina314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lindsay Nichols
33W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tricia Patterson
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Rachel Gould
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Ruthan Tattersall
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cyndi Mcdougall
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Shelley Vandermeulen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Denise Canina
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Mona Peterson
8W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Wendy Paul
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Amanda Mccaughin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cheryl Madlener
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Debbie Jensen
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Joanne Ludwig
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Mayra Campbell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.