Teams

RHCC RED

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs GR REDWon 20
W#1 SinglesTessa Vickers vs Cassie Urban6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Mercado / Nicole Stefanski vs Libby Donohue / Summer Vasilas6-2, 7-5
2023-07-12vs PH GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Anderson / Melissa Argenti vs Nancy Waas / Kate Funk5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTessa Vickers / Nicole Stefanski vs Lisa Bowser / Kristin Poister4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-06vs BCST BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Farquhar / Melissa Anderson vs Leslie Aranjo / Kathleen Antony4-6, 6-7
2023-06-28vs KC-CC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Anderson / Julie Farquhar vs Carla Minckley / Nathalia Urbano2-6, 4-6
2023-06-21vs BM GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Argenti / Julie Farquhar vs Sarah Chapman / Kristiane Lucas6-2, 6-3
2023-06-18vs MC REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesLiz Mercado vs Urmie Mroz4-6, 3-6
2023-06-14vs NJ ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesLiz Mercado / Nicole Stefanski vs Heather Roberts / Kristen Lovely1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTessa Vickers / Melissa Argenti vs INNA SELIVERSTOVA / Svitlana Pylypenko5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Tessa Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Melissa Argenti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Cheryl Crawford
published 3
2.60
Tiffany Skiles
published
2.42
Liz Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Farquhar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Nicole Stefanski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Farquhar + Melissa Argenti4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tessa Vickers
71W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Melissa Argenti
27W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cheryl Crawford
10W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Tiffany Skiles
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Liz Mercado
46W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Julie Farquhar
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Nicole Stefanski
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.