← Teams

N OR-VTC-Chiu

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Diana Almy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
3.56
Carol Chiu
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Pamela Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Joanne Reardon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Lori D'Antonio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2022-11-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJoanne Reardon / Lori D'Antonio vs Julie Hanson / Julie Bradford6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Clancy / Carol Chiu vs Ellen Bowman / Hideko Kershaw6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Buckley / Karen Pickering vs Cheryl Roloff / Suzanne Boss6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-12Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesJoanne Reardon / Kelly Asbridge vs Amy Alpern / Mary Elliott4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Carol Chiu vs Linda Paulk / Kate Hunter7-5, 6-2
2022-11-06Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesKelly Asbridge / Lisa Provost vs Char Riley / Linda Paulk5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Carol Chiu vs Kate Hunter / Deirdre Harms6-3, 6-2
2022-10-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesEarline Millsaps / Joanne Reardon vs Judy Knox / Rise Hawley6-3, 6-2
2022-10-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJoanne Reardon / Earline Millsaps vs Maureen Busby / Lori Robertson6-4, 6-4
2022-10-16Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJoanne Reardon / Lori D'Antonio vs Mary Sides / Marie Picard6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Buckley / Laura Webb vs Linn Wofford / Mary Rousseau6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTina Clancy / Diana Almy vs Kathryn Smith / Marcia Baisch6-1, 6-3
2022-10-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDiana Almy / Tina Clancy vs Lisa Cohns / Joelle Lewis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Buckley / Laura Webb vs Susan Suttich / Debbie Tingey7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKelly Asbridge / Cindy Rushall vs Kathleen Budnick / Nancy Atkins6-3, 6-3
2022-10-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPamela Buckley / Lisa Provost vs Teresa Jackson / Hong Allen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Almy / Karen Pickering vs Babette Zielinski / Chrys Culver2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Chiu / Cindy Rushall vs Susan Branam / Tracy Ouyang6-2, 6-1
2022-09-24Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDiana Almy / Tina Clancy vs Sharon Grilley / Lynn Sosa7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Webb / Pamela Buckley vs Carrie Fisher / Karen McNairy7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Chiu / Cindy Rushall vs Kathryn Smith / Marcia Baisch7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Diana Almy
50W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Carol Chiu
87W–73L career
19%81%0%
3.56
4
Pamela Buckley
56W–37L career
22%78%0%
3.56
4
Joanne Reardon
32W–33L career · type A
35%65%0%
3.52
3.5
Lori D'Antonio
77W–85L career
0%81%18%
3.44
3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.