Teams

Hot & Flashy

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · 9.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-25vs Too Fit to QuitSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Jill Kanahele vs Karen Sullivan / Petra Dupont6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet King / Maylynn Ikioka vs Sarah Schmidt / Cynthia Funai2-6, 5-7
2024-05-19vs Too Fit to QuitWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Maylynn Ikioka vs Petra Dupont / Caroline Gammie3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet King / Fa'Aiuga Ratterman vs Karen Sullivan / Deborah Sawyer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Jill Kanahele vs Rachel Christopher / Cynthia Funai6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-19vs Too Fit to QuitLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Rita Ingstad vs Mona Decrinis / Tracy Halbersleben6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet King / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt vs Karen Sullivan / Rachel Christopher6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFa'Aiuga Ratterman / Lory Kaufman vs Petra Dupont / Deborah Sawyer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-11vs Too Fit to QuitLost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Kanahele / Janet King vs Karen Sullivan / Caroline Gammie3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRita Ingstad / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt vs Rachel Christopher / Mona Decrinis4-6, 4-6
2024-05-05vs Too Fit to QuitLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Maylynn Ikioka vs Tracy Halbersleben / Mona Decrinis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRita Ingstad / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt vs Sarah Schmidt / Karen Sullivan3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie Haughney / Lory Kaufman vs Cynthia Funai / Rachel Christopher2-6, 1-6
2024-04-27vs Too Fit to QuitLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeanna DiBiase / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt vs Tracy Halbersleben / Mona Decrinis1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRita Ingstad / Debbie Montgomery vs Petra Dupont / Karen Sullivan4-6, 1-6
2024-04-21vs Too Fit to QuitWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Feike / Ruby Matsui vs Mona Decrinis / Rachel Christopher6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet King / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt vs Petra Dupont / Cynthia Funai2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRita Ingstad / Debbie Montgomery vs Tracy Halbersleben / Karen Sullivan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-20vs Too Fit to QuitLost 12
W#1 DoublesRuby Matsui / Maylynn Ikioka vs Tracy Halbersleben / Mona Decrinis6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Kanahele / Deanna DiBiase vs Rachel Christopher / Caroline Gammie6-7, 4-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Stanley-Hunt / Rita Ingstad vs Karen Sullivan / Deborah Sawyer2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Too Fit to Quit6217719171
2Hot & Flashy2671738250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Ruby Matsui
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.92
Deanna DiBiase
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Jill Kanahele
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.89
Maylynn Ikioka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Cynthia Feike
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.84
Rita Ingstad
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Leslie Haughney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Fa'Aiuga Ratterman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Janet King
published
Lory Kaufman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Ingstad + Debbie Montgomery7457% games+18.6% vs expected
Rita Ingstad + Janet King14560% games+14.9% vs expected
Jill Kanahele + Deanna DiBiase231259% games+7.6% vs expected
Cynthia Feike + Ruby Matsui17759% games+3.3% vs expected
Lory Kaufman + Fa'Aiuga Ratterman16659% games+1.7% vs expected
Leslie Haughney + Rita Ingstad4258% games+0.4% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Jill Kanahele10454% games+0.3% vs expected
Maylynn Ikioka + Cynthia Feike2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ruby Matsui
54W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Deanna DiBiase
138W–103L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–165L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Maylynn Ikioka
109W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Cynthia Feike
88W–61L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Rita Ingstad
61W–45L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Leslie Haughney
80W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Fa'Aiuga Ratterman
32W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt
12W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet King
39W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lory Kaufman
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.