Teams

LCTA65/Lee/MPR

65 & Over · 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs HHTL65/Luba/Port RoyalSplit 11
W#2 DoublesClay Claiborne / Leonard Douglas vs Bryan Steelman / Richard Silver4-6
L#3 DoublesRussell Lacoste / Samuel Bennett vs Douglas Luba / Albert Wise4-6, 4-6
2024-10-13vs LLAS UPTA65A/Smith/SpindletreeLost 03
L#1 DoublesClay Claiborne / Russell Lacoste vs Larry Smith / Jerry Kortenber0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Bennett / Richard Weathers vs Kirk Villar / Tipton Bradford0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Lee / Leonard Douglas vs Robert Medlin / Roland Fournier4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-12vs LATA65/Robbins/SSPWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Draper / Leonard Douglas vs Bruce Cutler / Stan Gooding6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSamuel Bennett / Richard Weathers vs Richard Spangler / Tom Wright6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Michael Draper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Bruner
published 4
3.70
Clay Claiborne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Richard Weathers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Harry Nguyen
published 4
3.60
Joseph Harnage
published
3.50
Leonard Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Russell Lacoste
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Samuel Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Draper + David Bruner3352% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Draper
63W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
David Bruner
52W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Clay Claiborne
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Richard Weathers
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Harry Nguyen
18W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Joseph Harnage
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Leonard Douglas
32W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Russell Lacoste
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Samuel Bennett
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.