Teams

Diamondhead - Hailes

2025 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0+

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-16vs OSTC - MayLost 03
L#1 SinglesChristina Robinson vs Abby Chapman1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Hailes vs Jennifer Maisano6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLucy Stevens vs Andrea May5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-12-08vs BBTC - MendenhallLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephanie Dohner vs Tana Cooper6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChristina Robinson vs Angie Simmons2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesNicole Montagnet vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall4-6, 3-6
2025-11-20vs BBTC - MendenhallWon 21
W#1 SinglesStephanie Dohner vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNicole Montagnet vs Tana Cooper6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLucy Stevens vs Lynette Cooper5-7, 0-6
2025-11-13vs OSTC - MayWon 21
W#1 SinglesStephanie Dohner vs Andrea May6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLucy Stevens vs Kelsey Martin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMary Kay Walk vs Molly Pittman6-1, 6-4
2025-10-30vs OSTC - MayWon 30
W#1 SinglesStephanie Dohner vs Andrea May6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNicole Montagnet vs Kelsey Martin6-2, 7-6
W#3 SinglesJennifer Hailes vs Katie Brandon2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-27vs BBTC - MendenhallLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephanie Dohner vs Carly Nichols Coy6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesChristina Robinson vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMary Kay Walk vs Lynette Cooper5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Mendenhall5111715135
2Diamondhead - Hailes339919141
3OSTC - May1571126180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Christina Robinson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.43
Lucy Stevens
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Nicole Montagnet
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.21
Jennifer Hailes
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.83
Mary Kay Walk
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Stephanie Dohner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kay Walk + Jennifer Hailes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Robinson
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Lucy Stevens
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Nicole Montagnet
38W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Jennifer Hailes
23W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
Mary Kay Walk
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Stephanie Dohner
6W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.