Teams

Racqueteers

2025 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-21vs Blazing Dodgers 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBahaa Ghammraoui vs Victor Sanchez6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-08vs Blazing Dodgers 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Batu / Xavier Rouse vs Xavier Cha / Keitaro Nishimura2-6, 1-6
2025-06-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesLeonardo Balieiro / Bahaa Ghammraoui vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTim McNamara / John Batu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-04vs Racq PackWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Batu / Tim McNamara vs Mark Wang / Mervin Dennis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-20vs Racq PackSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatt Dale / Bahaa Ghammraoui vs Olugbenga Okubadejo / Mark Wang3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Owen / John Batu vs Segun Eubanks / Larry McCollum3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
John Batu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
DONG YOON SHIN
published 3.5
3.33
Bahaa Ghammraoui
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Tim McNamara
published
3.17
Stephen Owen
published
3.14
3.13
Tom Erdely
published
3.10
Taurean Branch
published
2.94
Jesse Brooks
published
2.86
Jose Toro
published
2.83
Milad Ebrahimi
published
2.81
Leonardo Balieiro
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Matt Dale
published
Timothy Murphy
published
Xavier Rouse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Toro + Tom Erdely134 matchesnot enough data
Tim McNamara + Mehdy Sedaghat Payam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Batu
115W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
DONG YOON SHIN
7W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Bahaa Ghammraoui
57W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Tim McNamara
93W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Stephen Owen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Mehdy Sedaghat Payam
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Tom Erdely
26W–55L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Taurean Branch
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jesse Brooks
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Milad Ebrahimi
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Leonardo Balieiro
38W–34L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Matt Dale
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Murphy
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Xavier Rouse
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.