Teams

UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 18AW4.0A-DT

2024 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Harriet Ragozin
published 4
3.94
Christina Bird
published 4
3.92
Kristin Dillehay
published
3.84
Alexandra Olsen
published 4
3.75
Karyn Ellis
published
3.69
Jessica Berg
published
3.64
Jillian Gee
published
3.64
Nancy Lieberman
published
3.52
Rebecca Fox
published
3.47
Lauren Denenberg
published
3.43
Donna Eaton
published 4
3.29
Teri Parekh
published
3.23
Julie Arnheim
published
Luciana Guarnieri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Fox + Teri Parekh123 matchesnot enough data
Teri Parekh + Jillian Gee033 matchesnot enough data
Teri Parekh + Alexandra Olsen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harriet Ragozin
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Christina Bird
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
Kristin Dillehay
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Alexandra Olsen
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.84
Karyn Ellis
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Jessica Berg
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
Jillian Gee
26W–46L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.64
Nancy Lieberman
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Rebecca Fox
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lauren Denenberg
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Donna Eaton
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
Teri Parekh
51W–79L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.29
Julie Arnheim
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Luciana Guarnieri
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.