← Teams

CP-Doubles Trouble-Han

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-06vs BTA-Tennis Jam-Cecil-MooreWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesMadhur Joshi / Dana Laursen vs Jim Sternberg / Priscilla Yow6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStanley Ching / Cherry Ching vs Michael Best / Ge Li6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoette Dalton / JJ Dalton vs David Relyea / Francisca Lehr6-2, 6-3
2022-07-31vs PL-Samma Mish Mashers-EscalonaLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMary Pope / John Pope vs Beth Wray / Doug Wray4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCherry Ching / Stanley Ching vs Anne Welch Coulter / Prasad Gopalkrishnan5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Chinn / Marshall Winget vs Mia Koida / Gaylord Escalona3-6, 3-6
2022-07-24vs MI-BertramLost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMadhur Joshi / Priyanka Joshi vs Vaishak Suvarna / Jessica Crump6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Pope / John Pope vs Justin Pae / Jeannie Pae2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStanley Ching / Cherry Ching vs Heidi Martin / Christopher Martin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-17vs TCSP-Fast and the 40+ NguyenWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesMadhur Joshi / Priyanka Joshi vs Alyssa Grundmeyer / James Milton Smith6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStanley Ching / Cherry Ching vs Steve Stetter / Jennifer Gale6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlessandro Contenti / Tara Darrow vs Zhe Yang / Anna Karlin5-7, 2-6
2022-07-09vs RTC-Mixed Madness 40+ HansberryLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDan Stumpf / Tara Darrow vs John Minnich / Kay Almer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlessandro Contenti / Tina Chinn vs Jeff Herrera / Rene Ahern4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKamyar Moinzadeh / Sasha Moinzadeh vs Dinesh Murthy / Julie Hansberry4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-26vs BC-ClementeWon 2–1
W#1 DoublesMadhur Joshi / Priyanka Joshi vs Julie Lynch / Juan Vegarra6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoette Dalton / JJ Dalton vs Tom Clemente / Paige Green3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Laursen / Dan Stumpf vs Deanne Bilsborough / Joe Bilsborough3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-17vs EDG-Namba 7.0Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesStanley Ching / Cherry Ching vs Michael Ko / Mami Shimomura6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristen Grobstok / Colleen Grobstok vs Barry Nishimura / Miye Moriguchi3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTara Darrow / Marshall Winget vs Thomas Hei / Angela Hei7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HBSQ-Furman70201390
2PL-Samma Mish Mashers-Escalona701838130
3FC-Ball Busters-Mar7016513156
4PSC-Song/Zhu 7.06118311154
5CAC/SL-Brohams-Wanat6116512161
6WSC-Azure-Popoaei6115614147
7MI-Bertram6117415167
8TCSP-tennis crush-Wickham5215615172
9PSC-Zhang/Mu5215615153
10CAC/SL-All Mixed Up-Agarwal5214717177
11EDG-Fun-Juhn52111023184
12EDG-Netsetters-Gliner4312921187
13TCSP-Fast and the 40+ Nguyen43111021177
14CP-Doubles Trouble-Han43111022160
15FC-Scorpions-Calpe34101124194
16BELL-Mixed Up'Hamsters-Harwood3491227212
17BC-Lee/Camara3481329207
18TCSP-Bursiek3471430214
19CP-Key in Bowl-Chen2471124173
20BETC-Kean/Shutt 7.02591224193
21CP-Cloud Warriors-Viriththamulla2581331209
22EDG-Namba 7.02571431226
23RTC-Mixed Madness 40+ Hansberry2571432234
24PL-Carter2571433216
25MI-Double Shot-Holland2541735226
26TCSP-Double Trouble-Arron1661534236
27AYTC-It's Not Racquet Science-Chow0631531200
28WSC-Love All-Whitney0761532217
29AYTC-This is 40-Love-Padilla0751633231
30BTA-Tennis Jam-Cecil-Moore0721938235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Madhur Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.50
Joette Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Dan Stumpf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Cherry Ching
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Tina Chinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Kristen Grobstok
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lin Han
published 3.5
3.25
Alessandro Contenti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Priyanka Joshi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Mary Pope
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Marshall Winget
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Stanley Ching
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
John Pope
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Dana Laursen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Tara Darrow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Colleen Grobstok
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Sasha Moinzadeh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Kamyar Moinzadeh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
JJ Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madhur Joshi + Priyanka Joshi29–564% games+14.8% vs expected
Sasha Moinzadeh + Kamyar Moinzadeh10–461% games+7.8% vs expected
Cherry Ching + Stanley Ching33–961% games+7.2% vs expected
Mary Pope + John Pope9–1547% games−1.1% vs expected
Lin Han + Alessandro Contenti3–645% games−4.0% vs expected
Kristen Grobstok + Colleen Grobstok5–1440% games−4.6% vs expected
Mary Pope + Alessandro Contenti3–14 matchesnot enough data
Dana Laursen + John Pope0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Madhur Joshi
78W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
3.5
Joette Dalton
57W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Dan Stumpf
74W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cherry Ching
100W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Tina Chinn
101W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Kristen Grobstok
49W–57L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Lin Han
61W–49L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Alessandro Contenti
85W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Priyanka Joshi
81W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Mary Pope
76W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Marshall Winget
50W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Stanley Ching
64W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
John Pope
53W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Dana Laursen
70W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
3.5
Tara Darrow
52W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Colleen Grobstok
68W–79L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Sasha Moinzadeh
49W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Kamyar Moinzadeh
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
—
JJ Dalton
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.