Teams

BASALT RED

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-20vs CROWN BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Sale / Lauren Noble vs Judi Simecek / Kelly Capri6-2, 6-4
2024-09-13vs CROWN BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Roggie / Ashley Richardson vs Brady Emens / Kathy Robinson6-1, 7-5
2024-09-06vs CROWN BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Miranda Wagler / Susan Blizzard6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Noble / Meghan Hegberg vs Judi Simecek / Kimberly Welsh2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMeghan Hegberg vs Brandi Vinger1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-24vs CROWN BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Diane Boat vs Miranda Wagler / Brandi Vinger6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Given / Meghan Hegberg vs Judi Simecek / Kelly Capri6-4, 6-2
2024-08-16vs CROWN BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Boat / Meghan Hegberg vs Megan Hayes / Alexandra Braeger3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Jones / Ashley Richardson vs Kelly Capri / Kathy Robinson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Stacey Adams
published
3.44
Diane Boat
published 3.5
3.43
Amy Roggie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Sale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Meghan Hegberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Kristen Foote
published
3.23
Lauren Noble
published
3.00
Ashley Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Kate McRaith
published
Jennifer Given
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Hegberg + Lauren Noble3257% games+5.1% vs expected
Anne Sale + Stacey Adams6455% games−1.0% vs expected
Anne Sale + Amy Roggie2454% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Hegberg + Kate McRaith044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Adams
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Diane Boat
50W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Amy Roggie
95W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sale
88W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Meghan Hegberg
59W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Kristen Foote
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Lauren Noble
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ashley Richardson
41W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kate McRaith
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Jennifer Given
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.