Teams

V.Fleischmann

2023 Cap Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-13vs K.Serow 55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Priscilla Nanney vs Debra Allen / Carol Vervaert5-7, 1-6
2023-04-06vs C.COUCHLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Chavez / Vickie Dagit vs Susan Bowers / Pam Weis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVanessa Fleischmann / Mary Strothmann vs Cathy Couch / Kellie Bradley5-7, 5-7
2023-03-30vs W.Sielaty 3.0 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Strothmann / Priscilla Nanney vs Linda Chabinsky / Jill Salstrand3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Vanessa Fleischmann vs Teri O'Neill / Jade Paunovich1-6, 3-6
2023-03-23vs D.Williams 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Mary Strothmann vs Suzanne Ruggles / Diane Williams3-6, 3-6
2023-03-09vs R.Ziperski 3.0 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesJudy Colby / Mary Strothmann vs Donna Rutigliano / DEBRA LAUGHERY6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Longest / Vickie Dagit vs Lesa Edwards / Chris Lickey4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Mary Strothmann
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Judy Colby
published
2.55
Priscilla Nanney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Lavonne Moore
published
2.44
Lynn Longest
published
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
2.35
Kathryn Williamson
published
Ellen Werner
published
Jane Diepenbrock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Nanney + Mary Strothmann121847% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Judy Colby
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Priscilla Nanney
41W–122L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54
3
Vickie Dagit
28W–96L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lavonne Moore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lynn Longest
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.44
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.42
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.35
Ellen Werner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Diepenbrock
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.