Teams

An.Wood40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-01vs Je.Sagal Solomon40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKate Pirrung / Janice Lewis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLori Larrabee / Beth Murray vs Jennifer Sagal Solomon / Jennifer Kimball6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-27vs Ma.Wetzler-Behar40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Barrasso / Margie Molloy vs Patricia Steele / Anne Redmond3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-13vs Br.Robinson40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanice Lewis / Lori Larrabee vs Jennifer Martin / Wendy Roberts6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Murray / Kate Pirrung vs Donna Hovis / Sarah Winstead7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAngela Wood / Leigh Watson vs Michele Storr / Yvette DeSilva1-6, 3-6
2023-09-06vs Ki.Lamb40C5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Wood / Janice Lewis vs Vinaya Verghese / Susan Furr6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargie Molloy / Megan Barrasso vs Michele Lagerstedt / Helen Michaels3-6, 1-6
2023-08-23vs St.King40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Pirrung / Leigh Watson vs Melissa Proctor / Debra Vaughn7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargie Molloy / Megan Barrasso vs Kristen Rauth / Susan Gentry6-4, 6-4
2023-08-21vs La.Edgerton40CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAngela Wood / Beth Murray vs Alice Touchette / Laura Edgerton2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Larrabee / Margie Molloy vs Denise Gold / Shauna Alexander2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-02vs Kr.Gilreath40C5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Larrabee / Leigh Watson vs Kristi Gilreath / Stacie White2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Wood / Margie Molloy vs Lanier McRee / Kristen Duke2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Kate Pirrung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Lisa DeMarco
published
2.92
Lori Larrabee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Megan Barrasso
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Angela Wood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.49
Leigh Watson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Wood + Lori Larrabee1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kate Pirrung
185W–118L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
Lisa DeMarco
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Lori Larrabee
36W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Megan Barrasso
37W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Angela Wood
21W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
Leigh Watson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.