Teams

SDNC WC 3.0 Morgan Run/ Lemon (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-18vs SoCal 3.0 Rancho Santa Fe/ OrtelSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHeather Lemon vs Brittney Matzinger6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTammy Lloyd / Shauna Schneider vs Marisel Bastias / Jill Ruzich1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Li / Tammy Lloyd vs Lori Strom / Caroline Vance6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Lemon / Jennifer Bolger vs Amy Rosenberg / Susana M Smith6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Lemon vs Maggie Simone6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Lloyd / Elizabeth Li vs Peggy Semerdjian / Janie Munce7-5, 6-0
2022-02-04vs SoCal 3.0 Rancho Santa Fe/ OrtelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Lloyd / Elizabeth Li vs LJ Nicholas / Molly Tanner3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Lemon vs Sara Bennett6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Li / Tammy Lloyd vs Kathryn Glaser / Maggie Simone6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Lemon / Michelle Elliott vs Mary Behnam / Christy Horton4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesTammy Lloyd / Elizabeth Li vs Lyssa Schmitt / Nellwyn Voorhies6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Elliott / Heather Lemon vs Jennifer Vanvoorst / Rita Zitterman7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTammy Lloyd / Elizabeth Li vs Caroline Vance / Melissa Kench6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Lemon / Jennifer Bolger vs Amy Rosenberg / Nichole Dolinsky6-2, 6-0
2022-01-07vs SDNC 3.0 RPTC/ Levine (2:2)Won 20
W#1 SinglesHeather Lemon vs Sally Myungok Yeem6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEileen Gonzalez / Tammy Lloyd vs Miriam Lauff / Carol Witkin7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Tammy Lloyd
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Heather Lemon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.80
Jennifer Bolger
published
2.73
Eileen Gonzalez
published 3
2.68
Elizabeth Li
published 3
2.52
Barbara Haynor
published 3
Jennifer Nestor
published
Karen Pado
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tammy Lloyd
65W–30L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Heather Lemon
130W–102L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%6%94%
3.20
Jennifer Bolger
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Eileen Gonzalez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Barbara Haynor
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
2.52
Jennifer Nestor
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Pado
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.