Teams

Daisies

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - Sun Valley · Women 4.0 - 40 & OVER

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs PoppiesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Figge / Jennifer Embree vs Elizabeth Holman / Kristine Szarkowitz6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPenelope Brennan / Kristin Hovencamp vs Berit Campion / Amy Johnson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMartha Hausmann / Martha Moseley vs Maya Burrell / Denise DeCoster4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesMina Griswold / Barbara Figge vs Berit Campion / Elizabeth Holman6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Hovencamp / Martha Moseley vs Kelly McCloskey / Julie Gulick6-3, 6-4
2022-07-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Figge / Kelly Smith vs Berit Campion / Elizabeth Holman7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPenelope Brennan / Martha Hausmann vs Denise DeCoster / Kelly Roberts6-1, 6-0
2022-07-11vs PoppiesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPenelope Brennan / Mina Griswold vs Berit Campion / Kristine Szarkowitz6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMartha Moseley / Gayle Stevenson vs Denise DeCoster / Jeanelle Posch3-6, 5-7
2022-06-27vs PoppiesWon 10
W#2 DoublesPenelope Brennan / Barbara Figge vs Maya Burrell / Julie Gulick6-4, 6-1
2022-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Figge / Mina Griswold vs Denise DeCoster / Julie Gulick6-1, 6-1
2022-06-13vs PoppiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMina Griswold / Jennifer Embree vs Lori Bouch / Amy Johnson6-1, 6-3
2022-06-06vs PoppiesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Figge / Jennifer Schwartz vs Amy Johnson / Lori Bouch6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPenelope Brennan / Mina Griswold vs Maya Burrell / Denise DeCoster6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Daisies62211125239
2Poppies26112145317

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barbara Figge
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
Christine Mangham
published
Martha Moseley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mina Griswold
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Penelope Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Figge + Mina Griswold314 matchesnot enough data
Mina Griswold + Penelope Brennan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barbara Figge
21W–3L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Christine Mangham
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Moseley
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mina Griswold
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Penelope Brennan
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.