Teams

Je.Brooks18M

2023 Cap 18 & Over Mixed · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-16vs Ke.Johnston18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Stellar / Sharon Fred vs Cameron Burch / Michelle Kurtz7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Bass / Eric Bass vs Melissa Cleary / John Cleary6-1, 6-4
2023-07-09vs Me.Everitt18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Steve Abourisk vs Stephen Holmes / Camille Gibbs2-6, 0-6
2023-07-02vs Be.Robertson18MWon 20
W#2 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Christine Peterson vs Rick Smith / Susan Haughney6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Stellar / Sharon Fred vs Kelly Sutton / Bryan Sutton7-6, 7-6
2023-06-29vs Al.Fitzsimmons18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Jessica Grossano vs Ben Desonglo / Andrea Desonglo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteve Abourisk / Diane Abourisk vs Raul Louzao / Kimberly Lamm6-3, 6-4
2023-06-25vs Ga.Lovejoy18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Christine Peterson vs Micah Widen / Liz Arcos5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Bass / Eric Bass vs Denton Dickerson / Jenna Raynor3-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Ta.LeFevre18MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAndrew Patterson / Diane Abourisk vs Brent Townsend / Kelly Townsend5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Lee / Christine Bass vs Brian Ross / Anna Koltchagova6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2023-06-04vs Je.Phillips18MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Hill / Sharon Fred vs Jeme Avent / David Coman6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Abourisk / Christine Peterson vs Allison Graves / Scott Lundy2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Bass / Eric Bass vs Jessica Phillips / Matt Phillips3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Daniel Hill
published 4
3.58
Kevin Abourisk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.29
Diane Abourisk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
David Lee
published 3.5
3.13
Christine Bass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Sharon Fred
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Anne Mueller
published 3
2.64
Steve Abourisk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Abourisk + Steve Abourisk82139% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Hill
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Kevin Abourisk
40W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Diane Abourisk
103W–135L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
David Lee
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Christine Bass
78W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.13
3
Sharon Fred
149W–155L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Anne Mueller
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Steve Abourisk
21W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.