Teams

Richards/Memphis

2022 Combo 40 & Over - Memphis · 7.5 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Betsy Ferguson
published 4
3.53
Latasha Echols
published
Carolyn Jennings
published 3.5
Jacqueline Sharp
published 3.5
2.92
Jennifer Sigan
published
2.91
Agatha Asemota
published 3
2.87
Laurita Jackson
published
2.86
Tarshian Moon
published
2.85
2.85
Mina Chung
published
2.71
Sandra Richards
published
2.70
Cheryl Body
published 3
2.65
Lora Bridgewater
published
2.40
Cheryl Patterson
published 3
Jean Miller
published
Jill Dapremont
published
Teresa Santiago
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Body + Agatha Asemota4642% games−10.7% vs expected
Lora Bridgewater + Cheryl Patterson01028% games−17.6% vs expected
Wendy Wider-Burroughs + Mina Chung134 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Sharp + Jean Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Richards + Latasha Echols033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Betsy Ferguson
34W–48L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Latasha Echols
54W–59L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Carolyn Jennings
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jacqueline Sharp
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Sigan
34W–38L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Agatha Asemota
20W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Laurita Jackson
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Tarshian Moon
51W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Wendy Wider-Burroughs
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
Mina Chung
7W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sandra Richards
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.71
3
Cheryl Body
18W–54L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Lora Bridgewater
2W–18L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
3
Cheryl Patterson
0W–24L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
Jean Miller
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Dapremont
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Santiago
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.