Teams

Brehart/18/3.0/WN/CCLA

2024 BR Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 BR (18&O) Women Night

19 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 BR (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Julie Talbot
published
3.12
Summer Soileau
published
3.02
Jennifer Mogenson
published
2.91
Rondi Cowart
published
2.82
Heather Cutrer
published
2.77
Terre Smith
published
Crystal Donovan
published 3
2.74
Monica Folse
published
2.66
Lauren Bordelon
published
2.62
Jan Morello
published
2.60
Kaylin Percy
published
2.60
Theresa Gomez
published
2.57
Nicole DeMoss
published
2.43
Jan Chiles
published
2.33
Meredyth Rotolo
published
2.29
Jolie Bourgeois
published
Catherine Brehart
published 2.5
2.19
Vanessa Richard
published
Monica Ellender
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Richard + Jolie Bourgeois4161% games+15.9% vs expected
Rondi Cowart + Terre Smith5163% games+11.9% vs expected
Theresa Gomez + Jan Chiles3246% games+8.1% vs expected
Jan Chiles + Terre Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Gomez + Jennifer Mogenson213 matchesnot enough data
Rondi Cowart + Summer Soileau213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Mogenson + Terre Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Julie Talbot + Heather Cutrer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Talbot
27W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Summer Soileau
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Mogenson
42W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.02
Rondi Cowart
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91
Heather Cutrer
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Terre Smith
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Crystal Donovan
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Folse
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Lauren Bordelon
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Jan Morello
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Kaylin Percy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Theresa Gomez
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Nicole DeMoss
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Jan Chiles
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Meredyth Rotolo
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Jolie Bourgeois
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Catherine Brehart
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Richard
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Monica Ellender
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.