Teams

Legends - Delgreco

2026 LeeCharlotte Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Women Thursday Eve

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-12vs FMRC - BoydWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Susan DelGreco vs Leigh Lewis / Nancy Sanders6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPeggy Martin / Mary Heasley vs Joanne Reilly / Virginia Mazman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeanette Witten / Kelly Bishop vs Victoria Boyd / Linda King7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Cypress Lake - ManiboSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Joanna Godden vs Amy Marinell / Kelly James2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusan DelGreco vs Kim Regets7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBarbara Campbell / Jeanette Witten vs Victoria Manietta / Sara Manibo5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElery Shaw / Peggy Martin vs Mary Witham / Christine Wiles3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Gateway - BlackmonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoanna Godden / Barbara Campbell vs Linda Blackmon / Alisha Daines6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanne Meeks / Mary Heasley vs Pamela Baumgart / Bonita Spight-Williams4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElery Shaw / Kelly Bishop vs Peggy Inniss / Molly Hawkins3-6, 3-6
2026-02-19vs Paseo - ZimmerLost 04
L#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Susan DelGreco vs Vickie Kirsten / Leticia Garcia4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Heasley vs Amanda Patten3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPeggy Martin / Jeanne Meeks vs Lisa DeLauder / Shelly Zimmer Wald6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Campbell / Barbara Nuzzi vs Colleen Benson / Marilyn Kole3-6, 1-6
2026-02-12vs Babcock National - McDonaldWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan DelGreco / Joanna Godden vs Anne Mcdonald / Karen Nuthals6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeanette Witten vs Lori Bieniek0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWendy Tauscheck / Donna Lee vs Theresa Raker / Diana Barajas6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeanne Meeks / Mary Heasley vs Linda Revis / Heather Intress6-3, 7-5
2026-02-05vs LEECHAR/AttusoLost 13
L#1 DoublesWendy Tauscheck / Joanna Godden vs Sally Loessner / Hilary Cole2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSusan DelGreco vs Dorothy Waldron6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Campbell / Mary Heasley vs Janet Choisnet / J Q Hall6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElery Shaw / Peggy Martin vs Kim Shotwell / Jane Zito0-6, 3-6
2026-01-29vs Courts at Cape Coral - RiccioLost 12
W#1 SinglesJoanna Godden vs Heather Humann6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPeggy Martin / Jeanne Meeks vs Sue Savage / Kim McNeely3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Heasley / Barbara Nuzzi vs Cathrin Matzen / Val Pacenta2-6, 1-6
2026-01-22vs UTC - GonzalezSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Wendy Tauscheck vs Jenny Schultz / Beryl Gonzalez6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSusan DelGreco vs Lucia Parvan6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Heasley / Jeanne Meeks vs Debbie Hele / Cindy Woods6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Bishop / Peggy Martin vs LaDonna Tackett / Regina Lookis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Women Thursday Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEECHAR/Attuso71221024212
2Cypress Lake - Manibo62171535287
3Paseo - Zimmer53221023238
4FMRC - Boyd35161638283
5Legends - Delgreco26141840302
6UTC - Gonzalez26112144314
7Babcock National - McDonald0872551335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Joanna Godden
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.45
Susan DelGreco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.32
Jeanette Witten
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Wendy Tauscheck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Barbara Campbell
published 3.5
3.19
Mary Heasley
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Jeanne Meeks
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.07
Elery Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Peggy Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Barbara Nuzzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Heasley + Jeanne Meeks224 matchesnot enough data
Elery Shaw + Peggy Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Susan DelGreco + Joanna Godden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanna Godden
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Susan DelGreco
52W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jeanette Witten
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Wendy Tauscheck
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Campbell
7W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Heasley
44W–61L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Jeanne Meeks
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Elery Shaw
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Peggy Martin
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
3
Barbara Nuzzi
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.