Teams

Woodcreek-Church

2024 SCTA Winter '23 · '24 - USTA Adult 18 & Over

19 players · average NTRP 3.07 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for '24 - USTA Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Tamara LeClair
published
3.28
Andrea Feygin
published 3.5
2.98
Lais Saleh
published
2.94
Lesa Dugas
published
2.92
Juliet Skonberg
published
2.76
Patricia Chapman
published
Cindy Becker
published 3
2.73
Lisbeth Church
published
2.72
Beth Willingham
published 3
2.70
Tawana Stanphill
published
2.69
Melissa Orme
published
2.69
Susan Spradley
published
2.66
Mary Beth Wyler
published
2.66
Maura Gair
published
2.61
Daun Brown
published 3
2.55
Gayle Ardillo
published 3
2.49
2.48
Angela Plaisance
published 3
2.31
Vicki Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Chapman + Juliet Skonberg4353% games+6.1% vs expected
Lisbeth Church + Lesa Dugas8256% games+4.7% vs expected
Lesa Dugas + Beth Willingham5552% games+1.9% vs expected
Lesa Dugas + Patricia Chapman5260% games+0.5% vs expected
Lisbeth Church + Patricia Chapman4448% games−0.7% vs expected
Lais Saleh + Melissa Orme121152% games−0.7% vs expected
Constance Ruddock + Beth Willingham2642% games−4.9% vs expected
Constance Ruddock + Gayle Ardillo1640% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tamara LeClair
62W–43L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Feygin
30W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Lais Saleh
25W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lesa Dugas
32W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
Juliet Skonberg
25W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Patricia Chapman
29W–41L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cindy Becker
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisbeth Church
35W–33L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Beth Willingham
17W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Tawana Stanphill
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Melissa Orme
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Susan Spradley
12W–27L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Mary Beth Wyler
17W–34L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
Maura Gair
12W–29L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Daun Brown
21W–44L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.61
3
Gayle Ardillo
9W–29L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Constance Ruddock
8W–27L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Angela Plaisance
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Vicki Walker
6W–33L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.