Teams

Payne Park Hall

2023 Sarasota Social 70 & Over Women Fall · 7.0 W Wednesdays

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-05vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLinda Kretlow / Mona Harrington vs Dale Cole / Sue Hackney6-3, 7-5
2023-11-29Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Barbara Boyle / Alice Levine6-4, 7-6
2023-11-22Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Joan Cadd / Carol Hill6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-08vs Island Walk ThawleySplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Nancy Dickson / Jacki Kilian7-6, 6-2
L#2 Female DoublesJill Bressler / Mona Harrington vs Trish Connolly / Mae Rose3-6, 2-6
2023-11-01vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Sandi Gayheart / Jenny Spencer6-2, 6-3
2023-10-18Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesMona Harrington / Linda Kretlow vs Barbara Boyle / Alice Levine5-7, 4-6
2023-10-11vs Island Walk ThawleyWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesJill Bressler / Linda Kretlow vs Gretchen de Boer / Jill Sneider6-4, 6-4
2023-10-04vs Royal PaynesWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesJanet Hepner / Linda Kretlow vs Pamela Deems / Carol Hill2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesdays have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Marianne Zentz
published
3.19
Beverly Austgen
published 3.5
3.09
Catherine Hawkins
published 3.5
Janet Hepner
published
Jean Floyd
published
Jill Bressler
published
JoMarie Privitera
published
Linda Kretlow
usually #1 Female Doubles 88%, also #2 Female Doubles 13% · published
Mona Harrington
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published
Sigi Moriece
published
Taffy Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Kretlow + Mona Harrington181453% gamesnot enough data
Janet Hepner + Linda Kretlow7644% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Austgen + Catherine Hawkins1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marianne Zentz
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Beverly Austgen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Catherine Hawkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
Janet Hepner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jean Floyd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Bressler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
JoMarie Privitera
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Kretlow
38W–26L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mona Harrington
128W–145L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sigi Moriece
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Taffy Anderson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.