Teams

16 Raintree Stahling

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-04vs 6 ACAC StephensLost 01
L#1 DoublesBridget Westhoven / Carolyn Moncure vs Lara Hansen / Jeanette Kim3-6, 3-6
2022-05-22vs 23 Avalon ArmstrongWon 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Webb / Susan Evans vs Betsy Siewers / Sarah Croft-Whelan6-4, 6-4
2022-05-21vs 2 ACAC Naylor/HoeferLost 01
L#2 DoublesMona Stahling / Carolyn Moncure vs Katherine Guerette / Tatiana Smirnov2-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs 8 Bon Air Balsamo/BlackburnLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Sharon Camden vs Nancy Metz / Deanne Ralston3-6, 1-6
2022-04-14vs 15 Dominion WagnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Barbara Portanova vs Annmarie Lobred / Heidi Collier4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Webb vs Nancy Price6-3, 7-5
2022-04-09vs 13 Burkwood FarmerWon 10
W#1 DoublesValerie Caldwell / Carolyn Moncure vs Cynthia Muncy / Renee Culley6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-02vs 11 WOCC HaasWon 10
W#1 DoublesBridget Westhoven / Shannon Webb vs Yancey Haas / Janet Pommersheim4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Cam Nguyen
published 3.5
3.27
Carolyn Moncure
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.22
Bridget Westhoven
published 3.5
3.10
Shannon Webb
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
published
3.00
Christine Martine
published 3.5
2.74
Kathi Ford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Webb + Carolyn Moncure033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cam Nguyen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bridget Westhoven
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Shannon Webb
112W–98L career · 7 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Kathi Ford
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.