Teams

Apex:TBD:Bowring

2022 ME Fall Tri-Level · 3.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-04vs Apex:TBD:GraceffaLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Bowring / John Powers vs Joshua Graceffa / Harper Chalat2-6, 0-6
2022-12-03vs Apex:MainelyMental:HardyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJerome Faure / Steven Buxton vs Dave Kroondyk / Scott Hardy5-7, 6-7
2022-11-13vs Apex:TBD:PiccoloLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Bowring / Sante Calandri vs Andrew Piccolo / Marc Chadbourne3-6, 3-6
2022-11-13vs Apex:MainelyMental:HardyLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Bowring / Sante Calandri vs Scott Hardy / Dave Kroondyk4-6, 3-6
2022-11-12vs Apex:TBD:ThurmWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Bowring / John Powers vs Bob Thurm / Mike Coughlan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-30vs Apex:TBD:ThurmLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Bowring / Taylor Krowitz vs Bob Thurm / Mike Coughlan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-29vs Apex:TBD:PiccoloWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Buxton / Sante Calandri vs Marc Chadbourne / Sean Dundon6-3, 6-1
2022-10-29vs Apex:MainelyMental:HardyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerome Faure / Sante Calandri vs Dave Kroondyk / John Cannon6-3, 7-6
2022-10-29vs Apex:TBD:PiccoloLost 01
L#1 DoublesJerome Faure / Chris Bowring vs Marc Chadbourne / Andrew Piccolo3-6, 4-6
2022-10-02vs CLC:TBD:SperanzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Bowring / Patrick Casey vs Jack Speranza / Michael Blake4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACOPI:GripandRip:Emmert5151242
2Apex:TBD:Piccolo4242451
3MRC:TBD:Arau3333658
4Apex:MainelyMental:Hardy3333660
5Apex:TBD:Bowring2424863
6MRC:TBD:Nickelson15151171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Sante Calandri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Jerome Faure
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Steven Buxton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Bowring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sante Calandri + Jerome Faure19263% games+1.5% vs expected
Chris Bowring + Steven Buxton113042% games−2.2% vs expected
Chris Bowring + Jerome Faure1643% games−7.0% vs expected
Steven Buxton + Jerome Faure033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sante Calandri
138W–116L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jerome Faure
207W–135L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Steven Buxton
117W–106L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
Chris Bowring
65W–125L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.