Teams

Seminole's Perfect Combo

2022 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 W Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-03vs ELW Grand SlammersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMartyne LaDuke / Sherrl Fry vs Christine Noll / Amy Burns4-6, 4-6
2022-11-12vs Belleair EvansWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill MacNeil / Tamara Tindell vs Cambria Whalen / W A Mantell6-3, 6-1
2022-11-05vs McMullen SenoritasLost 01
L#3 DoublesTamara Tindell / Jill MacNeil vs Kirsten Willis / Wendy Unger1-6, 1-6
2022-10-29vs SPTC JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSherrl Fry / Martyne LaDuke vs Karin Hartenbach / Ethel Murphy2-6, 2-6
2022-10-22vs ELW Grand SlammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Hobbs / Tamara Tindell vs Kari Matheny / Sigrid Bratic3-6, 1-6
2022-10-01vs SPTC JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesTamara Tindell / Donna Dicus vs Lucy Robertson / Diane Haymes6-2, 6-3
2022-09-25vs McMullen SenoritasLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartyne LaDuke / Ruth Barnett vs Cheryl Pawlowski / Kelly Moore3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Worthington / Tamara Tindell vs Kirsten Willis / Wendy Unger5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Diana Zarreke
published 4
3.62
Donna Dicus
published 4
3.57
Martyne LaDuke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Tamara Tindell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Ann Worthington
published 3.5
3.35
Deborah Larsen
published 3.5
3.26
Ruth Barnett
published
Arlene Fricke
published 3.5
3.25
Maribel Gross
published
3.20
Jill MacNeil
published
3.14
January Moennig
published
3.07
Kristen Pierce
published
Sherrl Fry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maribel Gross + Ruth Barnett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Zarreke
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Donna Dicus
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Martyne LaDuke
28W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Tamara Tindell
97W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Ann Worthington
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Deborah Larsen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Ruth Barnett
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Arlene Fricke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maribel Gross
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jill MacNeil
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
January Moennig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kristen Pierce
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.