Teams

ERC:Maitland/

2025 NCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesJames Maitland / Steven Martino vs Jeffry Morton / Steve Wargat2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAl Tebbetts vs Seth Johnson6-4, 3-6, 4-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Chu / Sam Chang vs Simon Ostrov / Damon Querim0-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs FV:Racqueteers:Aronson/WeckmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Chu / Steven Martino vs Shankar Raman / Scott Schoem0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAl Tebbetts vs William Weckman3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSam Chang / James Maitland vs James Young / Carlos Badiola2-6, 0-6
2025-03-01vs MLM:40 + 3.5:Lincer/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Chu / Steven Martino vs Randy Miller / Benjamin Butkus6-4, 2-6, 1-5
L#2 DoublesSam Chang / Americo Rodrigues vs John Scarfo / Craig McAdams4-6, 7-5, 2-4
W#3 DoublesGreg Nicoletti / Matthew Trottier vs Clive Thomas / Gregory Lewis7-6, 4-6, 9-9
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Al Tebbetts
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Steven Martino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Sam Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
James Maitland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Matthew Trottier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Americo Rodrigues
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Greg Nicoletti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Chu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sadiq Hasoon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Maitland + Steven Martino0632% games−2.2% vs expected
Americo Rodrigues + Matthew Trottier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Al Tebbetts
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Steven Martino
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Sam Chang
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
James Maitland
3W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Matthew Trottier
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Americo Rodrigues
16W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Greg Nicoletti
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Chu
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sadiq Hasoon
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.