Teams

Naples Grande - Graham

2022 Collier Combo 50 & Over Summer · 7.5 Combo 50 & over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-29vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Benzing / Linda Koole vs Sunny Barger / Renee Facciola2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Carol Trombino vs Marie Shoaf / Shirley Steffen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Villani / Jane Mills vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-25vs COLLIER / WashakLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Koole / Carol Trombino vs Bernadette DiPino / Suzanne Messere2-6, 2-6
2022-08-16vs Quail West - SeeseLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Black / Kim Craig vs Barbara Fortunato / Susan Phelps5-7, 0-6
2022-08-15vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Jane Mills vs Judy Kobel / Melody Miller6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-07-25vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 02
L#2 DoublesKim Craig / Linda Koole vs Carla Klumpp / Mia Delk2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Black / Carol Trombino vs Gretchen Landolt / Rosemary Rolak6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-18vs COLLIER / WashakLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeticia Lancsarics / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Bernadette DiPino / Susan Julich6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Jane Mills vs Jeanette Thevening / Marianne Khayat5-7, 2-6
2022-07-11vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 12
W#1 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Kim Craig vs Lori Caple / Dot Hall7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Leticia Lancsarics vs Lori Coates / Katherine MacWilliams4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Koole / Mary Ann Benzing vs Minde Shinnick / Nancy Spiwak7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-27vs Quail West - SeeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Jane Mills vs Renee Biggam / Susan Phelps4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Koole / Mary Ann Benzing vs Faye Johnson / Christine Seese6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Gwendolyn Messonnier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Linda Koole
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Victoria Pollock
published
Leticia Lancsarics
published
Mary Villani
published
Nancy Black
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gwendolyn Messonnier
133W–140L career · 3 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Linda Koole
123W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Leticia Lancsarics
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Villani
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Black
70W–90L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.