Teams

YTC-Liveand55

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-24vs PEAK-QuallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Bruggeman / Terry Marden vs Tim Qualls / Glen Satre4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJim Stewart / Gary Johnson vs Doug Conboy / Guy Schneider4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Degrasse / Richard Lozano vs Kevin Tweed / Terry McHugh7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-10-23vs Palouse-Palouse Tennis ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Buck / Jeff Bruggeman vs Steve Buckingham / Edward Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJames Degrasse / Richard Lozano vs John Lauck / Anthony Anegon3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJim Stewart / Gary Johnson vs DANIEL Vollmer / Freddie Nicholson6-0, 6-1
2021-10-23vs NP-SplichalWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Stewart / Gary Johnson vs Don Ho / Michael Ross6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanny Mullins / Ron Hartley vs Richard Splichal / Michael Kronenberg3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Marden / John Buck vs James Cramer / Richard Ross6-3, 6-4
2021-10-22vs CBRC-QafokuLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Marden / John Buck vs Ming Li / John Sands3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRichard Lozano / James Degrasse vs Emmitt Jackson / Vincent Beasley7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRon Hartley / Danny Mullins vs Nikolla Qafoku / Kent Ozkardesh6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jim Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Richard Lozano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
James Degrasse
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.36
Danny Mullins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jeff Bruggeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Buck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ron Hartley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Terry Marden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Lozano + Jim Stewart111249% games+0.1% vs expected
Richard Lozano + James Degrasse41340% games−12.3% vs expected
James Degrasse + Danny Mullins3537% gamesnot enough data
Richard Lozano + Danny Mullins2347% gamesnot enough data
James Degrasse + Ron Hartley134 matchesnot enough data
Ron Hartley + Danny Mullins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jim Stewart
32W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Richard Lozano
92W–93L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
James Degrasse
34W–82L career · 7 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Danny Mullins
33W–53L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jeff Bruggeman
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Buck
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Hartley
8W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Marden
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.