Teams

Angelo/40/6.5/CWN/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 Shrev

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 16 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 23 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 30 7:30 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 7 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
2026-09-02vs Burchett/40/6.5/CWN/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammie Harris / Holli Griffin vs Allison Santos / Valarie Thiels4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarcie Harner / Amy Turner vs Vanessa Hernandez / Angela May0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNong Boutaloth / Toni Goodin vs Christi White / Kathy Benton6-4, 6-4
2026-08-26vs Cummer/40/6.5/CWN/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarmen Aviles / Tammy Rhodes vs Emily Overdyke / MLiss Sella1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Vincent / Kelly Clayton vs Kimberly Arizmendi / Lynette Campisi6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNong Boutaloth / Tanji Lyrse vs Madeline Cummer / Stephanie Knox6-2, 6-3
2026-08-19vs Hood/40/6.5/CWN/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Malone / Marcie Harner vs April Walker / Shelly Fielder2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTammie Harris / Holli Griffin vs Lesley Harter / Barri Copete7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTing Liang / Becky Crain vs Emily Walker / Vikki Stell6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesTanji Lyrse / Carmen Aviles vs Katie Rickert / Kristen McElveen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesToni Goodin / Kelly Clayton vs Amanda Middlebrook / Elizabeth Crafts7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaty Vincent / Kimberly Smith vs Cynthia Jones / Lesa Warren5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 6.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gordon/40/6.5/CWN/BTC1030012
2Burchett/40/6.5/CWN/BTC1030013
3Cummer/40/6.5/CWN/POTC1030223
4Angelo/40/6.5/CWN/QTC1021220
5Voigt/40/6.5/CWN/BTC1021326
6Silvio-Stafford/40/6.5/CWN/POTC0112432
7Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC0112536
8Hood/40/6.5/CWN/BTC0103630
9Free/40/6.5/WCN/CTC0103636
10Matheny/40/6.5/CWN/STCC0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Nong Boutaloth
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Carmen Aviles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Katy Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Kathy Malone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Tammie Harris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Holly Bissell
published
2.97
Ting Liang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Marcie Harner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Becky Crain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Tammy Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Toni Goodin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Parisa Zamani
published
2.75
Holli Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Tanji Lyrse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Kelly Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Debbie Angelo
published 3
2.48
Marijane Jeansonne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Goodin + Tammy Rhodes2442% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Angelo + Parisa Zamani4158% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Malone + Katy Vincent134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Clayton + Toni Goodin123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Clayton + Katy Vincent123 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Rhodes + Parisa Zamani123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nong Boutaloth
43W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Carmen Aviles
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katy Vincent
16W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Kathy Malone
15W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tammie Harris
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Holly Bissell
9W–22L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Ting Liang
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Marcie Harner
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.92
3
Becky Crain
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Tammy Rhodes
26W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Toni Goodin
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Parisa Zamani
25W–36L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Holli Griffin
38W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Tanji Lyrse
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Kelly Clayton
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Debbie Angelo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Marijane Jeansonne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.