Teams

Servivors

Adult Tri-Level League · Tri Level Women Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Tri Level Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Amanda Connell
published 4.5
Hillary Ruechel
published 4.5
4.20
Beth Rickard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Pamela Shula
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Karey Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Riley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Veronica Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Carol Leslie
published 4
3.38
Lauren Ferrarelli
published
3.29
Stephanie Benson
published
3.28
Lisa Vanderlaag
published
3.25
Ana Rodgers
published 3.5
3.23
Anne Hesek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.59
Susan Allan
published
Beth Morrison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Shula + Karey Kelly5551% games+0.0% vs expected
Anne Hesek + Ana Rodgers554253% games−0.1% vs expected
Stephanie Benson + Lisa Vanderlaag123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Rickard + Pamela Shula303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Connell
102W–50L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Hillary Ruechel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Beth Rickard
92W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.20
Pamela Shula
29W–46L career · 1 line in 2021
35%65%<1%
4.05
Karey Kelly
66W–55L career · 1 line in 2021
52%48%<1%
4.00
4
Anne Riley
86W–63L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
4
Veronica Fox
162W–173L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Carol Leslie
163W–203L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
Lauren Ferrarelli
75W–91L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Stephanie Benson
19W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Lisa Vanderlaag
34W–45L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Ana Rodgers
68W–46L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anne Hesek
115W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Susan Allan
34W–96L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Beth Morrison
20W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.