Teams

KJohnson-UNC

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-28vs KTravis-ENOWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Amy Hoots vs Katie Elder / Krissy Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCora Darrah / Cheryl Stevens vs Tammy Chin / Jennifer Ogle7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Emma Gould6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLAURIE KIEFFER / Brienne Caranasos vs Maria Sanchez / Abigail Hatcher6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-14vs CWilliamson-CHCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Amy Hoots vs Lynn Furgurson / Monica Jenkins6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarti Jenkins / Vivian Muzyk vs Frances Wilson / Lee Harris6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Kate Souto7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLAURIE KIEFFER / Elaine Yeh vs Danielle Iordanou-Lille / Joli Stockwell4-6, 3-6
2025-04-07vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 31
W#1 DoublesCheryl Stevens / Marti Jenkins vs Kim McWhorter / Hadley Nixon6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Betsy Euler6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLAURIE KIEFFER vs Deborah Hertzog6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Harshbarger / Maria Hernandez vs Cecily Peterson / Lauren Powell6-2, 6-3
2025-03-31vs KTravis-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Rebecca Walsh4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCora Darrah / Maria Hernandez vs Maria Sanchez / Colleen Davis1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-24vs PAlford-ENOLost 13
W#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Amy Hoots vs Denise Decandia / Karen Johnston6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEllen Reich / Elaine Yeh vs Kendra McAdory / Paige Alford2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Margaret Ann Gonella3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Hubbard / Kate Harshbarger vs Liz Arcos / Jennifer Kaulback6-7, 2-6
2025-03-17vs KMoore-HVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Amy Herman6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Catherine Jefferson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Reich / Patty Hubbard vs Melanie Biese / Kristen Ingle1-6, 0-6
2025-03-10vs HRoberts-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Lorraine Hall7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Heather Roberts6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCora Darrah / Kate Harshbarger vs Natalie Naramor / Aulia Tandradinata4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-03vs CWilliamson-CHCCWon 21
W#2 DoublesCheryl Stevens / Marti Jenkins vs Jennifer Rosen / Lynn Furgurson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Carrie Williamson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrienne Caranasos / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Kate Souto / Jane Holroyd3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Amy Hoots
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.52
Dana Cantrell
usually #2 Singles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.43
Marti Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Anne Cable
published 3.5
3.34
Cheryl Stevens
published 3.5
3.30
Elaine Yeh
published
3.21
Kate Harshbarger
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.19
Patty Hubbard
published
3.08
Cora Darrah
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Vivian Muzyk
published
2.95
2.93
Ellen Reich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
LAURIE KIEFFER
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Yeh + Cheryl Stevens5356% games+0.7% vs expected
Kate Harshbarger + LAURIE KIEFFER3347% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Reich + LAURIE KIEFFER224 matchesnot enough data
Cora Darrah + Kate Harshbarger314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Hoots
105W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.17
3.5
Dana Cantrell
57W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Marti Jenkins
35W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Anne Cable
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Elaine Yeh
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Kate Harshbarger
72W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Patty Hubbard
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cora Darrah
115W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Vivian Muzyk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Brienne Caranasos
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3.5
Ellen Reich
76W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
LAURIE KIEFFER
70W–74L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.