Teams

Beerman - K. Wilinkson

2025 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.60 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-05vs Lake Wales - J. WilsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesGina Barfield / Megan Denz vs Adriana G.Daunt / Alexis Wharem6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Monti vs Amy Tully6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelissa Grimes / Brooke Wilson vs Diana Williams / Susan Cruze7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-12vs Lake Wales - J. WilsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Bonfil / Brooke Wilson vs Susan Cruze / Debbie Burgess6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrandy Noel vs Amy Tully7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGina Barfield / Deborah Joell-Bullock vs Courtney Boynton / Jessica Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-27vs Lake Wales - J. WilsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesTatum Bennett / Gina Barfield vs Diana Williams / Adriana G.Daunt7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Monti vs Amy Tully6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDeborah Joell-Bullock / Brooke Wilson vs Susan Cruze / Jessica Wilson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Sarah Monti
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Brandy Noel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Tatum Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Britni Hall
published 2.5
Deborah Joell-Bullock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gina Barfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Melissa Grimes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Heather Bonfil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karli Hughes
published
Kristan Sheffield
published
Megan Denz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Monti
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Brandy Noel
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Tatum Bennett
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%10%90%
2.66
2.5
Britni Hall
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Deborah Joell-Bullock
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Gina Barfield
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Grimes
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Heather Bonfil
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Karli Hughes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristan Sheffield
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Denz
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.