Teams

Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.5B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

31 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-15vs WILLOW PASS PK 18AM4.5AWon 40
W#1 DoublesStephen Flynn / Martin Dunlap vs Carlos Manuel / Antonio Ambriz6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIoann Timokhin vs Siddharth Naik6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDan Gullion / Boris Bindman vs Carlos Carbajal / Bellal Daunish6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMaverick S Maghirang vs Adil Ahmed6-1, 6-0
2025-05-11vs WILLOW PASS PK 18AM4.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartin Dunlap / Teddy Handoko vs Carlos Carbajal / Adil Ahmed1-0
W#1 SinglesStephen Flynn vs Antonio Ambriz7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNick Behling vs Siddharth Naik3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Debashis Panda
published 4.5
4.29
Ioann Timokhin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Maverick S Maghirang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Boris Bindman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cameron Larner
published 4.5
Chris Bown
published 4.5
David Wu
published 4.5
4.24
Martin Dunlap
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Stephen Flynn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Teddy Handoko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Bryan Balde
published 4.5
4.17
Joseph Barnes
published
4.12
Martin Nunez
published
4.11
Michael Attiyeh
published
4.06
Sanjay Backliwal
published
4.03
Harish Natarajan
published 4.5
4.02
Nicholas Greenwald
published
3.94
Dan Gullion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Jonathan Maze
published
3.92
Jeffrey Magidson
published
3.91
Akiva Elias
published 4.5
3.82
Kamal Mistry
published
3.81
Tuan Khong
published
3.77
Nick Behling
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Mark Chase
published
3.70
Alex Aguilar
published 4
3.70
Manish Singh
published
3.57
Christopher Lau
published 4
Josef Nunez
published
Matthew Matrisian
published
Mike Welden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sanjay Backliwal + Harish Natarajan2343% games−8.3% vs expected
Jonathan Maze + Stephen Flynn404 matchesnot enough data
Martin Dunlap + Michael Attiyeh123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Flynn + Debashis Panda303 matchesnot enough data
Alex Aguilar + Christopher Lau213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Debashis Panda
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Ioann Timokhin
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Maverick S Maghirang
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Boris Bindman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cameron Larner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chris Bown
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Wu
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Dunlap
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.24
Stephen Flynn
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Teddy Handoko
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Bryan Balde
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Joseph Barnes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Martin Nunez
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Michael Attiyeh
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.11
Sanjay Backliwal
10W–32L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Harish Natarajan
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Nicholas Greenwald
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Dan Gullion
37W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Jonathan Maze
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
Jeffrey Magidson
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4.5
Akiva Elias
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Kamal Mistry
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
Tuan Khong
15W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Nick Behling
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Mark Chase
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.75
4
Alex Aguilar
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Manish Singh
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Christopher Lau
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Josef Nunez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Matrisian
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Welden
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.