Teams

BC-MCC/NahiaHossain

2024 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 2.95 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
LIsa Cook
published
3.00
Jennifer Browne
published
2.94
Heather Baboolal
published 3
2.94
Nissa Diederich
published
2.91
2.76
Anne DeMartini
published 3
2.75
Shelby Campion
published
Amy Pearce
published 3
Dana Leyland
published 3
2.70
Garima Goel
published 3
2.69
2.58
Ashita Johnson
published 3
2.56
Linda Buchanan
published
2.51
Cindy Emanuel
published 3
2.49
Candice Maloney
published 3
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
2.38
Staci Carey
published
2.33
Helen Evers
published 2.5
Janet Wisialowski
published
Julie Fields
published
Katy Dunbar
published
Leah Niehaus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Maloney + Staci Carey3537% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Emanuel + Garima Goel044 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Campion + Garima Goel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LIsa Cook
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jennifer Browne
12W–22L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Heather Baboolal
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Nissa Diederich
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Anne DeMartini
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Shelby Campion
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Amy Pearce
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dana Leyland
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Garima Goel
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Ashita Johnson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Linda Buchanan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Candice Maloney
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.44
Staci Carey
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.38
2.5
Helen Evers
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.33
Janet Wisialowski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katy Dunbar
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leah Niehaus
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.