Teams

1-JMontague-CCC

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / David Schumann vs Richard Poole / Ryan Soles6-2, 6-1
2022-10-10vs 3-AYoung-EV-Combo-6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / David Schumann vs Keith Buckel / Michael Andre6-3, 6-4
2022-10-05vs 4-ZRowles-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Arash Chehrazi vs Zach Rowles / Owen Daly6-2, 6-0
2022-10-03vs 7-AMacKelfresh-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesRick Edmunds / Richard Riedel vs Russell Davis / Carl Laird6-7, 6-7
2022-09-17vs 3-AYoung-EV-Combo-6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Rick Edmunds vs Sathyan Guru / Michael Andre1-6, 3-6
2022-08-31vs 5-ASkubic - EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Will Johnson vs Will Burton / Grant Harvey6-1, 6-0
2022-08-29vs 4-ZRowles-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Schumann / Arash Chehrazi vs Owen Daly / Zach Rowles6-2, 6-2
2022-08-24vs 2-ROakley-Eno ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Will Johnson vs Joe Park / Howard Kashefsky6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesArash Chehrazi / David Schumann vs Andy MacKelfresh / Marc Rosenthal6-1, 6-1
2022-08-03vs 6-RLong--EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Brent Fox vs Alex Kappus / Jordan Nader6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
published 3.5
3.32
Arash Chehrazi
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Conor O'Neill
published 3.5
2.96
Rick Edmunds
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Robert Long
published
2.83
2.75
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
Richard Riedel
published
Stephen Arrowood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3642% games−3.2% vs expected
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Conor O'Neill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Rick Edmunds
77W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Robert Long
21W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Christopher LeGrand
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brent Fox
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Riedel
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Arrowood
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.